We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sold house should I negotiate agent fees
Comments
-
The Estate Agent has found a buyer for you and your house is sold. Clearly there is a contract between you and the agent. On the one hand they introduced a buyer and on the other hand you agreed to the introduction, let the buyer view (via the agent) and accepted the buyer's offer (again I assume via the agent).
You have clearly accepted the EA's services so a contract exists.
That's the whole point it's not clear at all. If the agreement was between the builder and EA there may be no contract between EA and OP and it could be argued contract was between builder and OP and it becomes null and void if OP doesn't purchase from builder.0 -
AnotherJoe wrote: »That's the whole point it's not clear at all. If the agreement was between the builder and EA there may be no contract between EA and OP and it could be argued contract was between builder and OP and it becomes null and void if OP doesn't purchase from builder.
Not unless the contract with the builder states that the fees would be due. Could easily go EA has contract with the builder so EA charges builder then the builder charges the OP as builder has contract with OP.
OP carefully check what is in your contract with the builder. I had a similar arrangement with a builder before and I signed something with the EA and agreed a fee with them if I pulled out of buying the house.0 -
Perhaps. But I doubt it. As soon as the OP/builder deal collapsed, the EA would have no ongoing contract with the builder to find a buyer (since the builder could not sell).AnotherJoe wrote: »That's the whole point it's not clear at all. If the agreement was between the builder and EA there may be no contract between EA and OP and it could be argued contract was between builder and OP and it becomes null and void if OP doesn't purchase from builder.
So any buyer found who subsequently purchased, must have been introduced on behalf of the OP. There would be an implied contract between OP/EA.
Of course, judges can be fickle, so it's never certain how they'd rule if it went to court, but if I were the EA I would believe I had a good case and would pursue my fee.0 -
AnotherJoe wrote: »That's the whole point it's not clear at all. If the agreement was between the builder and EA there may be no contract between EA and OP and it could be argued contract was between builder and OP and it becomes null and void if OP doesn't purchase from builder.
If the builder has contracted with the EA to sell the property...
... I'd be 99.9% certain that the builder also has a contract with the OP, with terms that deal with this situation.
I'd bet that the OP's contract with the builder say something like..."If the EA we instruct introduces a buyer, or you introduce a buyer during the EA's sole agency period - and you don't buy our new build property - then you agree to pay a fee of £x to the EA."0 -
Quite possibly edddy. OP needs to look at what they signed.0
-
Hi all
Sorry for late response and some great replies
So I took out what is called a move maker with David Wilson homes I have reviewed contract and document and no mention of anything if I pull out and in fact they stated to me I couldn’t reserve the new build till I sold mine.
I haven’t signed a contract with estate agent they have now sent one out after I informed them I was going with an existing build it was at that point they then told me fees.
I will now check with DWH to make sure and also think £1500 is reasonable I just wondered if they was the possibility before I sign to get anything off.
Then again I don’t want to lose the sale do people think it’s not worth risking or if they do what would be your strategy price wise.
I wouldn’t want to cut the estate agent out as I appreciate the work they have done0 -
1.2% on a low value property is not that bad.0
-
Once you take VAT off the fee they will be getting <!% for a lower priced property which is a very reasonable fee.0
-
-
As long as it includes VAT! 1% + VAT is standard for low value properties around here (I couldn't negotiate any lower on similar priced flat recently).getmore4less wrote: »1.2% on a low value property is not that bad.I've got a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
