HX Car Park Gladstones

KeithP

I rest mine too. Good luck.

Redx

you are going to look a right numpty in court when you talk about CCTV and they say they do not use CCTV , they use ANPR real time monitoring instead

its not our fault that you do not know the difference between the two

frankly , I am sick of arguing with you so will bow out

I have no doubt that their reply to your SAR for CCTV footage will be met with a "we do not have any CCTV footage at all so cannot supply it" answer


I REST MY CASE TOO

isg

Statistics and Reporting
We monitor your car parks in real-time, and help you to better understand your customers behavior with in-depth analysis by supplying you with bespoke reports.

I Rest My Case !!!

isg

"We monitor your car parks in real-time,"
well at least I should thank you for digging this statement up from their own website I'm sure this will help so thanks

I accept I will probably be laughed out of court and have to pay a couple of hundred pounds for absolutely no reason but I have to at least register my voice against these low life crooks you live and learn and i am learning still !

I do suggest you guys open up a little and try to take other peoples views onboard without being so obnoxious

System

I do suggest you guys open up a little and try to take other peoples views onboard without being so obnoxious

You have a point but what you need to do is the following

1. Understand the court process. This means in the next 4 weeks you have to acknowledge the claim and send in a defence

2. If you do not acknowledge (which takes 2 minutes to do) you get a default CCJ. Acknowledging within 19 days of the date on the claim form gives you an additional 14 days.

3. If you do not defend within 33 days of the date you get a default CCJ

4. There are templates to use which will give you a guide to what is said in an initial defence. You should concentrate on the fact it was dark and no reasonable person could have seen the signs.

5. Once you have done all of the above, you send a Subject Access Request to HX who will supply copies of the paperwork they claim to have sent, photos of the car and pics of the signs. Ask for any CCTV images too pointing out that they claim to monitor car parks in real time. You will get these within 30 days but too late to include in a defence.

6. When the next paperwork arrives, come back for advice. The court process is used by HX to grind people down as there are 4 - 6 stages that need to be dealt with. It will be unfamiliar to you - but not to us.

For the others .....HX do use CCTV as do a number of other PPCs, especially Comprehensive Management Services. Have a look for the HX installation at the Shell garage at Satterthwaite(?) to see. How they get the images is immaterial to the DVLA as all they want is confirmation of the car plus VRM in a time stamped image

For isg. The use of CCTV by HX gives you an advanage as the images are rarely good enough to show the signs so you can challenge whether the copies they include in their court park are the real ones - as often they are not. You challenge whether the wording could be seen. Their poor evidence (using CCTV) kills most of their claims - but they are not interested in winning as most people fold when seeing these grainy images that are not of evidential quality.

nosferatu1001

OP - what youve done is !!!! off a few regulars in only 9 posts. Its fairly impressive.

Hopefully youve read post 2 of the newbies. Once youve done so, feel free to show us your defence.

If you are giving up already, and are determined to go your own way - instead of the way that works more often that it doesn t- well, thats your choice. Its not our fault you havea ticket, nor our fault you have a court claim.

Coupon-mad

For the others .....HX do use CCTV as do a number of other PPCs, especially Comprehensive Management Services. Have a look for the HX installation at the Shell garage at Satterthwaite(?) to see. How they get the images is immaterial to the DVLA as all they want is confirmation of the car plus VRM in a time stamped image

IamEmanresu, I am constantly amazed by your knowledge of locations and facts about sites and PPCs, and everything else you do to fight this fight behind the scenes.

For isg. The use of CCTV by HX gives you an advanage as the images are rarely good enough to show the signs so you can challenge whether the copies they include in their court park are the real ones - as often they are not. You challenge whether the wording could be seen. Their poor evidence (using CCTV) kills most of their claims - but they are not interested in winning as most people fold when seeing these grainy images that are not of evidential quality.

The OP needs to work on their defence; despite pi55ing off half the forum (I was away) they have here, the info and examples they need to defend it properly.

Umkomaas

despite pi55ing off half the forum (I was away)

Had you not been away, would that have been more, or less than half the forum C-m? :rotfl:

Coupon-mad

Haha, I never meant it like that!