We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Definition of HMO

My council requires that HMOs be licensed and I'm confused as to whether my rental counts as one or not. When I emailed the council licensing team my specific circumstances they replied with the following definition and said this is what I need to go by -

A building is now defined as a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) if all of the following apply:
- It is occupied as living accommodation
- by at least 3 people who belong to more than one family or household
- in accommodation that is not self-contained and
- rent is paid by at least one of the occupiers and
- it is the occupiers’ only or main residence.

I rent out a 3 bedroom terraced house as a whole, to 2 couples, on one single tenancy contract. Going by the above, it looks like it meets most of the conditions of an HMO. The only one I am not sure of is the one in bold. Could anyone tell me what that means please?

Thanks,

K
«1

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Do each couple live in self contained accommodation, or do they share?


    I suspect they share their accommodation with the other couple (household) so do not have self-contained accommodation, so the HMO definition is met.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    muhandis wrote: »
    ...
    The only one I am not sure of is the one in bold. Could anyone tell me what that means please?

    Self-containment is where all the rooms (including kitchen, bathroom and toilet) in a household’s accommodation are behind a single door which only that household can use.

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/definitions-of-general-housing-terms

    If there is only one kitchen and/or one bathroom in the property that is shared between the two couples it ain't self contained.
  • Nick_C
    Nick_C Posts: 7,637 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    edited 2 August 2018 at 6:23PM
    [STRIKE]I think the key point is how you have rented out the property.

    If you are renting to the couples separately - with two tenancy agreements - then it is an HMO.

    If you have rented out the house to people who happen to be two couples who were looking for shared accommodation, and have rented the house from you under a single tenancy agreement, then it is a single household and not an HMO.[/STRIKE]
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,849 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If they have facilities such as a shared bathroom, kitchen or living space then the accommodation is not self-contained.
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Nick_C
    Nick_C Posts: 7,637 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    edited 2 August 2018 at 6:41PM
    joshuajac wrote: »
    That would still be an HMO I "believe" because the definition is 3 or more unrelated persons sharing a house. Couples are treated as individuals for this definition I think.

    I think the only exemption is if it's an actual family as in married couple and kids making more than 3 persons. The definitions are only becoming more and more important to sort out because not having an HMO license when one is needed is now a criminal offence and the fines for getting it wrong are only increasing.

    Yes. I think you are right.

    I had assumed that four friends renting accommodation together under a single tenancy agreement would form one household, but that seems not to be the case.

    https://www.gov.uk/private-renting/houses-in-multiple-occupation provides useful guidance.
    A household is either a single person or members of the same family who live together.

    Also S258 of the Housing Act 2004 states:-
    2)Persons are to be regarded as not forming a single household unless!!!8212;
    (a)they are all members of the same family, or
    (b)their circumstances are circumstances of a description specified for the purposes of this section in regulations made by the appropriate national authority.

    I'm not aware of any regulations under clause b that change the definition.

    EDIT -

    This link confirms it is an HMO

    http://www.lawpack.co.uk/landlord-and-tenancy/managing-your-tenancy/articles/article6978.asp

    (Rhetorical question - why can't Council's just give clearer guidance?!)
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    joshuajac wrote: »
    Do you know anything about the new rules that are coming effect GM by any chance?
    No.


    :silenced:
  • muhandis
    muhandis Posts: 994 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thank you all for your help, it's been very informative!
  • muhandis
    muhandis Posts: 994 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Quick update - finally managed to speak to someone in the Council PRS team who gave me a patient hearing and useful advice!

    Turns out it is an HMO for licensing purposes but thankfully since less than 5 people, it falls under the additional licensing regime as opposed to the mandatory licensing regime.

    Fortunately, the application form for the additional license is fairly straightforward and the license conditions are much less onerous so hopefully should not be too much of a problem.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    joshuajac wrote: »
    That would still be an HMO I "believe" because the definition is 3 or more unrelated persons sharing a house. Couples are treated as individuals for this definition I think.

    I think the only exemption is if it's an actual family as in married couple and kids making more than 3 persons. The definitions are only becoming more and more important to sort out because not having an HMO license when one is needed is now a criminal offence and the fines for getting it wrong are only increasing.
    No. That's a load of nonsense.


    Couples are considered a single household. (married or otherwise)
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    joshuajac wrote: »
    Oh contrare! Not nonsense at all I say. I think you'll find that for the purposes of HMO's and in the context of this thread a couple are treated as individuals. - That is not what you said: for the record: "I think the only exemption is if it's an actual family as in married couple and kids making more than 3 persons." Couple's are treated as one household regardless of marriage. If you see this definition and then you read the OP's question you'll see what I mean. - then write it more clearly. Please let the record show I take no pleasure in showing that Comms69 is wrong! - you haven't... I require no admission of wrongness at all. I am merely helping Comms69 help himself acquire a greater depth of knowledge :) - You'd need to catch up first

    The key point here is: "Forming more than one household". I think I'm correct but I could be wrong. I would appreciate your thoughts - Forming more than one household is the key bit, which is why a couple would form one household, two couple would form two households....

    Houses in multiple occupation
    Your home is a house in multiple occupation (HMO) if both of the following apply:

    at least 3 tenants live there, forming more than 1 household
    you share toilet, bathroom or kitchen facilities with other tenants
    Try again (do some research first)


    https://nationalhmonetwork.com/what-is-an-hmo/what-is-a-household/


    I believe the term is 'mic drop'
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.