We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Car and cycle collision
Comments
-
AndyMc..... wrote: »It’s an accident because the prosecution failed to convict.
Was your view not that 12 people decided that?0 -
-
The car turns across the road, the lights catch the reflective panels, that's fairly obvious?
If the trousers were "light reflective" as described and well designed such as the link below, they will catch the light from all angles
https://www.provizsports.com/en-gb/nightrider-mens-waterproof-trousers.html
How can the lights catch a reflective strip on the back of some trousers is the cyclist is ringing towards a light source?0 -
-
Mercdriver wrote: »There's a reason the police don't call incidents accidents - very few incidents indeed are completely unpreventable.
Because they still and always have called them incidents. Your confusing accidents which are now collisions, however the road traffic act still refers to accidents.0 -
AndyMc..... wrote: »Yes, tweleve decided the prosecution failed to prove the case.
Or the 12 were the people who see a driver getting a ban/community service for their 2nd killing as justice served.Which IMO demonstrates a core issue.
there but the grace of god it could be me.
Jump on any online article with comments and see the hate/bias and ill informed on cyclists.
Now pick 12 at random and decide the worth of a cyclists life vs a drivers freedom/'right' to drive.
Right to as I said.0 -
-
AndyMc..... wrote: »Not true, they have nothing to do with sentencing.
So the 12 had nothing to do with it then?0 -
-
AndyMc..... wrote: »Do you understand how a crown court works?
A jury doesn't sentence.
Yes,thanks
It was you who brought the jury into it,remember?
also keep in mind some are Scottish cases0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
