We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

£40K sitting in non-interest bearing account

13»

Comments

  • firestone
    firestone Posts: 520 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 5 July 2018 at 6:49PM
    Jon12345 wrote: »
    What to do with it? I think I should be earning some interest, before inflation whittles it away!

    Jon
    if you are not one for chasing the best rate Octopus cash act as a middle man and offer a 1 year (paying 1.81%) and also 35 day account using 6 challenger banks to source a % rate and i believe they will roll it over to their best rate after a year if wished for less fuss but give you a month to decide
  • DrEskimo
    DrEskimo Posts: 2,463 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Paul_DNAP wrote: »
    With the prize pot being so skewed, in particular the big jump up between the top prize and the second to top prize, then nobody will trend towards earning the 1.4% return rate. Nearly everybody will be earning below that, averaging about 1% return, who will be subsidising the millionaires who are getting a million percent uplift on a £100 bond.
    The only way to get 1.4% would be to own every single premium bond out there by yourself. Even if you let someone else have just one, they could win one of the £million prizes and make a serious dent in your returns (even if they won a £25 it would drop your return below 1.4%, but you'd have to go to a lot of decimal places to see it).

    Yup makes sense. And looking at the premium bonds thread, it would appear it's as you say, closer to the 1% rather than 1.4% mean. A positive skew would support that.

    Its common for advertisers to use the mean in these situations, as it obviously gives a better rate than the median, despite it not being truly representative...

    As they say, a picture paints a thousand words, and this graphic does a nice job demonstrating the difference in means and medians depending on the data distribution....not that anyone asked for it :p

    main-qimg-a1e0adc0e991e6af793242f824112189-c
  • Jon12345
    Jon12345 Posts: 97 Forumite
    Just to throw something else into the mix, the fact there are outliers of £1M or whatever may in fact be a red herring when trying to judge a "typical" rate of return.

    Let's take an example. Say the probability of a £1M prize was 1 in a trillion trillion. Under these circumstances, the "typical" rate of return would be closer to 1.4%, since the outlier is so unlikely, that the bulk of the data will be weighted towards the more common prize likelihoods.

    Yes, I know that is not the probability of the £1M prize. But the principle still holds. How much you decide to reduce the 1.4% down by does depend on the odds for the £1M prize.
  • Terry_Towelling
    Terry_Towelling Posts: 2,279 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    DrEskimo wrote: »
    Sorry to be pedantic, but it almost certainly is not equally likely...
    .

    I'm quite happy with pedantry. If you look at what I said, I didn't say it was 'equally likely'; I said, 'equally'. Perhaps I should have been more careful with my choice of words. I meant 'equally' as in 'on the other hand'. And when you say it is 'almost certainly' not equally likely, just how certain is that? 90%, 50%, 99.999%:)

    As far as 'probability' and 'chance' are concerned they are not really the same. 'Chance' says, 'here are the available options; they are random but one of them will definitely happen'. Probability attempts to tell you how likely each one of those random options are. There is a 100% chance that I may roll a 6 on die three times in a row, but the probability of that happening is 1 in 216. Semantics? Maybe.

    What is the probability you will disagree with me?
  • Jon12345
    Jon12345 Posts: 97 Forumite
    I notice that the Post Office are doing online bonds fixed for one year at 1.7%.

    https://www.postoffice.co.uk/savings-accounts/online-bonds?campaignid=AG_OB_4000

    Does that mean I do not get access to my capital within that year, or does it mean that I do have access, but if I withdraw, I lose the 1.7% interest?
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,031 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Answers in the link you supplied
    • Can I withdraw money? You can't make withdrawals before the bond matures, so you need to be sure you won't need access to your money during the fixed term. However, we may allow you to close your account during the fixed term, at our discretion, in exceptional circumstances.
    • If you need to close your Account after the end of the 14 day cancellation period, due to exceptional circumstances, then a Bond breakage fee may be applied. This is detailed in the Terms and Conditions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.