PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying a house with a Qualified title

I'm in the process of buying a house and have learned that it has a 'qualified' title. It's over 200 years old and the qualification relates to the fact that the original lease for the land on which it is built was not produced at first registration. The present owner bought the house in the 1970's and says the lease was for 1000 years but was destroyed long before he owned it in a fire. Has anyone had a similar experience of buying with a qualified title?, I'm aware through my solicitor that I will need title indemnity insurance and the seller has said they will provide and so I'm wondering how concerned I should be? I can still pull out quite easily but the house is special so I'd like to continue.

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If the explanation is as you say, I would not be concerned.

    I suppose there is a minscule risk that after 50 years someone might suddenly appear and claim a right to the property via this lease.

    If that happened, indemnity insurace would (I think - check!)
    a) pay for the inevitable legal battle and
    b) compensate you if you lost that battle and had to move out

    It would not, of course, guarantee you could remain in occupation - that would be for the courts to decide.


    Up to you whether you accept those risks.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.