We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Plevin ppi case Santander

I submitted a Plevin PPI claim against Santander relating to a store card. This was submitted in February 2018. The response was slow, and In May, I followed this up, and was told it was taking so long because of the volume of complaints. I was told that this would be resolved by 18062018. I have made several calls after this date, and was eventually told that the bank had put all claims on hold pending advice, When pressed they would add no further details, but kept to the script, that all Plevin claims were on hold. I explained the advice from the FCA, but again was told they were all on hold. I asked for this to be put in writing, but this was refused.
Any advice?
«1

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just wait for them to work through the other 24,657,652 complaints and they will eventually get round to yours.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,231 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I explained the advice from the FCA, but again was told they were all on hold. I asked for this to be put in writing, but this was refused.
    Any advice?

    be patient. They will get around to you. And be thankful that every day they leave it, more interest is added.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • xcakex
    xcakex Posts: 157 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    I submitted mine the back end of last year after they wrote to me regarding the matter and still waiting, having rang and been told they had submitted over 22k letters i have rang and been told dept dealing with it are not taking calls.. so still sat waiting
    Believe you can win and you shall win !!!
    Wins for 2010-£2450 2011-£6100 2012-£4500
    2013-£3800 2014-£1200 2015 - £6500 2016-£2500 2017 - champagne £250 shopkins toys vodka spotify vouchers book
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,231 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    And every person chasing them up slows it down even more.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,058 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Sadly the money grubbing nature of people, often promoted by sites like this means every man and his dog will be trying to get more money, I bet half of them either didn't have PPI or had a refund and didn't read the article, just saw the £££ signs and put in another complaint delaying even further

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,231 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Nasqueron wrote: »
    Sadly the money grubbing nature of people, often promoted by sites like this means every man and his dog will be trying to get more money, I bet half of them either didn't have PPI or had a refund and didn't read the article, just saw the £££ signs and put in another complaint delaying even further

    it is true. It has been reported for many years that over half of complaints made do not actually have PPI. Yet many of those still make all the usual allegations of wrongdoing. Many of these generated by CMCs. (which are another symptom of greed)
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    dunstonh wrote: »
    It has been reported for many years that over half of complaints made do not actually have PPI. Yet many of those still make all the usual allegations of wrongdoing.
    To be fair, the complaint being "chased" by the latest OP in this thread was generated by the Bank itself writing to tell him about Plevin. While it's true general PPI complaints are often chancers who didn't even have the insurance, Plevin complaints are far more likely to have some genuine substance.

    We should be careful of putting off those genuinely disadvantaged by PPI (and Plevin) when we disparage those seeking what they obviously see as a free-for-all.
  • sourcrates
    sourcrates Posts: 31,992 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    edited 24 June 2018 at 5:17PM
    Its easy to forget that banks sold millions of these policies to people who never had any hope of any benefit from them, those who never knew they had them in the first place, then their are the ones who were told it was compulsory.

    If anyone was money grabbing, it was 100% the banks, who blatantly lied to there customers on a massive scale, there have been no apologies, no banker ever went to court, or jail, they just carried on with the same contemptuous attitude they always had even making us jump through hoops in order to get our money back.

    If it was you or I mis-selling policies to the public, we would end up doing time, but not the banks, I say good luck to anyone who gets there money back from these leeches.
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free wannabe, Credit file and ratings, and Bankruptcy and living with it boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.For free non-judgemental debt advice, contact either Stepchange, National Debtline, or CitizensAdviceBureaux.Link to SOA Calculator- https://www.stoozing.com/soa.php The "provit letter" is here-https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2607247/letter-when-you-know-nothing-about-about-the-debt-aka-prove-it-letter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    sourcrates wrote: »
    I say good luck to anyone who gets there money back from these leeches.
    While I don't disagree with anything you've said here, the earlier criticism was of the large number of obviously vexatious and invalid "complaints" received from people who weren't mis-sold anything at all!


    The point is that such "complaints" only cause more delay for those who were mis-sold.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,058 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 24 June 2018 at 9:10PM
    sourcrates wrote: »
    Its easy to forget that banks sold millions of these policies to people who never had any hope of any benefit from them, those who never knew they had them in the first place, then their are the ones who were told it was compulsory.

    If anyone was money grabbing, it was 100% the banks, who blatantly lied to there customers on a massive scale, there have been no apologies, no banker ever went to court, or jail, they just carried on with the same contemptuous attitude they always had even making us jump through hoops in order to get our money back.

    If it was you or I mis-selling policies to the public, we would end up doing time, but not the banks, I say good luck to anyone who gets there money back from these leeches.


    It's easy to forget most of the miss-selling was NOT done by banks but rather through channels such as store cards, finance for cars through dealers etc. Ranting about banks for a CIVIL issue (not a legal one) doesn't help. I agree there should be more action against banks and other finance firms but ONLY if there is equal action against both CMCs and customers who knowingly submit false claims for compensation. Far too much money has been paid out for dubious, even outright false, complaints from people who only see £££. People like me who have the sense to simply refuse these insurance packages lose out through fewer benefits offered to us while people who quite probably agreed to the package and then simply forgot or perhaps even deliberately pretend otherwise get paid large sums. The day a salesman who lied about PPI goes to jail, the person joining them should be someone who lied about having PPI and demanding money back.


    My point on this topic is that people who do appear to have been miss-sold are not getting their money back because the system is clogged up with fraudulent claims from people pretending to be miss-sold.


    When the next downturn comes, perhaps as soon as Brexit is finished, hundreds of thousands people will be in financial trouble and the insurance policy that could have covered their payments for their home will have been cancelled because CMCs and indeed, this site, have encouraged people to grub for refunds of packages that could be useful and will MSE or any firm put their hands up and apologise? No they'll have moved onto the next topic de jour trying to get money for nothing

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.