PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

stamp duty confusion, useless solicitor

Options
Riddle me this -

My missis bought an apartment with her mate. My missis lives in it, it was just an investment for her mate.

Now my missis and me are buying a house, but the two of them are keeping the apartment & renting it out. I don't have a property to sell.

Solicitor somehow missed these details and said stamp duty was £500. Now because the apartment ins't being sold, it's £5000.

The house is £150,000.

Now, as my missis only owns half the apartment, is there any implication on stamp duty, ie is it in some way less, or do I just take it on the chin? Luckily I've got the 5k or we'd be snookered, we are exchanging on monday lol
«1

Comments

  • davidwood681
    davidwood681 Posts: 881 Forumite
    You have to pay the 5K if she wants to keep the flat
  • pinklady21
    pinklady21 Posts: 870 Forumite
    Assuming you are in England, she would have 3 years to sell the first property owned - ie the flat - then you could reclaim the additional amount of Stamp Duty paid. (3% of £150,000.)
    If you are in Scotland, you only get 18 months to sell the flat.
  • spencer999
    spencer999 Posts: 212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    thought so.... worth a try grrrr
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If the value of your "missis's" share of the property is more than £40K (ie the property is worth £80K+) then you'll have to pay the additional SDLT as you (jointly) are buying a 2nd property.


    If your "missis" sells her share (assuming it used to be her main residence) ithin 3 years, you can claim back the additional SDLT.
  • Reds-on-Sea
    Reds-on-Sea Posts: 428 Forumite
    Er, I'm pretty sure you only have to pay the £500.

    I'm in a similar situation, I own a flat (which I rent out), and my partner and I are currently in the process of moving. If the property if your next home then you just pay the standard rate.

    check the drop-downs

    https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/tools/house-buying/stamp-duty-calculator

    An estate agent said to me that I'll have to pay the additional % as I own another property, but she was 100% wrong. Read up on it,

    https://www.gov.uk/stamp-duty-land-tax/residential-property-rates

    "If you're replacing your main residence
    You won't pay the extra 3% SDLT if the property you're buying is replacing your main residence and that has already been sold."

    You might be able to get round it.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 22 June 2018 at 3:18PM
    Entirely wrong.
    Er, I'm pretty sure you only have to pay the £500.

    "If you're replacing your main residence
    You won't pay the extra 3% SDLT if the property you're buying is replacing your main residence and that has already been sold."
    The OP's "missis" is keeping her existing property.

    She is not "replacing your main residence and that has already been sold."


    In your own case,
    I'm in a similar situation, I own a flat (which I rent out), and my partner and I are currently in the process of moving.
    how many properties do you currently own? If you are selling an existing property, which is your main residence, and buying a new one, then the property you rent out is irrelevant & you don't pay the extra SDLT.


    But if you currently live with mum&dad, or rent somewhere, then you will be increasing your property ownership from 1 (let out) to 2 (1 let out + 1 new main residence) and will pay the extra SDLT.
  • Reds-on-Sea
    Reds-on-Sea Posts: 428 Forumite
    G_M wrote: »
    Entirely wrong.
    The OP's "missis" is keeping her existing property.


    She is not "replacing your main residence and that has already been sold."


    So if it was already rented out and she lived with the OP, they wouldn't have to pay the premium
  • Reds-on-Sea
    Reds-on-Sea Posts: 428 Forumite
    oh, okay, I'm confusing the OP's situation with my own. If OP was selling, he could have moved his missus in, sold their property and escaped the SDLT premium. That's unfortunate as they're essentially FTBs (if they were living together)
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    So if it was already rented out and she lived with the OP, they wouldn't have to pay the premium

    The OP says he doesn't have a property to sell so if we take that to mean he doesn't own any property and hasn't for 3 years (I think that is correct) then the higher rate will apply because the missis will be purchasing an additional residential property.
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    It's not just the solicitor who missed the details but your missis as well. How have she and her friend concluded that continuing to own the property and rent it out is a good investment if she didn't even know the higher rate of SDLT would apply when she is purchasing an additional residential property?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.