Insurance claim denied - water supply pipe

Had a bit of trouble last week with the sound of water under the house. We called in an emergency plumber who suspected a water leak, and we authorised him to cut through the floorboards to investigate.

He cut a 40cm x 40 cm hole through the wood laminate / underlay / floorboards and discovered that the main water supply between the outside water meter and the inside stop valve was spraying water everywhere under the floor cavity. Root cause appears to be a pipe connector had worked itself loose by a half inch or so - it wasn't the full-on mains supply emptying itself, but it was fairly substantial.

No problem, we thought, we'll get it fixed and look at insurance to cover any repairs.

Our AXA HomeSmart insurance policy is standard house insurance _with_ trace and access but _without_ accidental damage.

AXA are denying any claim, and are refusing to even send an assessor out to have a look.

The relevant sections in the policy appear to be:
Standard house insurance:
Your policy covers the buildings for loss or damage resulting from the following causes: 2. Sudden and unexpected water leaking from or freezing in any washing machine, dishwasher, fridge, freezer or fixed domestic water, drainage or heating installation.
Accidental damage:
The following only applies if you buy accidental damage. 8. Accidental damage to cables, drain inspection covers and underground drains, pipes or tanks providing services to or from the home and for which you are responsible.


Their argument is that any cover for supply pipes are "accidental damage", and as we do not have this option then we aren't covered. The Trace and Access cover only appears to apply if the relevant claim is accepted.

My argument is that "fixed domestic water installation" is not defined, and that they are attempting to define the claim based on the object (the water supply pipe) rather than the action ("sudden and unexpected" vs "accidental damage").

Anyone with any experience in water supply pipes and insurance claims?

Comments

  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    Whenever you are not happy with your insurer the route to go down is a complaint in line with their complaints procedure.

    Then if you are unhappy with the reply or they ignore you for 8 weeks you can escalate to the FOS for their adjudication at no cost to you
  • fahan
    fahan Posts: 2 Newbie
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thanks Quentin, much appreciated.
  • FutureGirl
    FutureGirl Posts: 1,252 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Is the insurer perhaps getting confused and thinking you want the leak repaired and declining this element? As this would make sense for them to decline on the reasons given.

    Have you specifically said to them that you're only making a claim for the damage caused by tracing and accessing the leak?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.