We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Restrictive Covenant Query
Options

jarshay
Posts: 73 Forumite

Hi all,
We bought a house last year and there was a restrictive covenant affecting the adjoining farmland (not owned by us) to the back of our property, which we were not that fussed about as the previous owner said nothing/nobody had taken interest in the land in all the years she had lived here and we checked the planning portal too to confirm this. To provide slight background, our house was the farmhouse to the farm but was split in a transaction in 1986.
Fast-forward 5 months after purchasing and after seeing quite a few vehicles and people on the land, there is now an offer on the table to build 6-8 bungalows on the land behind our house.
I have just pulled out the paperwork and title documents to have a read through and was just wondering if anyone could provide me with some advice.
The covenant states:-
“Covenants by the Purchases
1. Forever hereafter to maintain the existing post and wife fences and concrete block wall as indicated on the plan.
2. No to do or perm it or suffer to be done in or upon the property hereby conveyed anything which may be or become a nuisance, annoyance or cause damage or inconvenience to the Vendors or neighbouring owners or occupiers.
3. At all time to pay the full cost of maintaining and emptying the cesspit herinbefore referred to.”
“Copy of covenant referred to in the said conveyance. ‘For the benefit and protection of the adjoining land of the Vendor which is edged green on the said plan and any part or parts thereof and so as to bind the property hereby conveyed into whosever hands the same may come the Purchasehers herby covenant which the Vendor that the Purchaser and its successors in title will not at any time erect any building or buildings on Ordnance Survey Number xxxx part within hundred feet in an easterly direction of the Eastern boundary of the said adjoining land edged green on the said plan”.
The prospective owner has been very friendly and said he will be very transparent with his plans and said he wants to come and talk to us in the next couple of weeks. I am just wondering if when he shows me the plans, there is a bungalow within 100ft of our eastern wall whether I should tell him that I’d prefer he didn’t build there or should I contact my solicitor?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Joshua
We bought a house last year and there was a restrictive covenant affecting the adjoining farmland (not owned by us) to the back of our property, which we were not that fussed about as the previous owner said nothing/nobody had taken interest in the land in all the years she had lived here and we checked the planning portal too to confirm this. To provide slight background, our house was the farmhouse to the farm but was split in a transaction in 1986.
Fast-forward 5 months after purchasing and after seeing quite a few vehicles and people on the land, there is now an offer on the table to build 6-8 bungalows on the land behind our house.
I have just pulled out the paperwork and title documents to have a read through and was just wondering if anyone could provide me with some advice.
The covenant states:-
“Covenants by the Purchases
1. Forever hereafter to maintain the existing post and wife fences and concrete block wall as indicated on the plan.
2. No to do or perm it or suffer to be done in or upon the property hereby conveyed anything which may be or become a nuisance, annoyance or cause damage or inconvenience to the Vendors or neighbouring owners or occupiers.
3. At all time to pay the full cost of maintaining and emptying the cesspit herinbefore referred to.”
“Copy of covenant referred to in the said conveyance. ‘For the benefit and protection of the adjoining land of the Vendor which is edged green on the said plan and any part or parts thereof and so as to bind the property hereby conveyed into whosever hands the same may come the Purchasehers herby covenant which the Vendor that the Purchaser and its successors in title will not at any time erect any building or buildings on Ordnance Survey Number xxxx part within hundred feet in an easterly direction of the Eastern boundary of the said adjoining land edged green on the said plan”.
The prospective owner has been very friendly and said he will be very transparent with his plans and said he wants to come and talk to us in the next couple of weeks. I am just wondering if when he shows me the plans, there is a bungalow within 100ft of our eastern wall whether I should tell him that I’d prefer he didn’t build there or should I contact my solicitor?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Joshua
Mortgage for £212000 - 10/17 for 35 years!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!
0
Comments
-
Without seeing the full document (ie the ccontext), it appears to me that you are not permitted to "erect any building or buildings on Ordnance Survey Number xxxx part within hundred feet in an easterly direction of the Eastern boundary".
Or have I misunderstood? Are you looking at the Title to your property, or title to the land next door....?0 -
Without seeing the full document (ie the ccontext), it appears to me that you are not permitted to "erect any building or buildings on Ordnance Survey Number xxxx part within hundred feet in an easterly direction of the Eastern boundary".
Or have I misunderstood? Are you looking at the Title to your property, or title to the land next door....?
I am the owner of the house that originally sold the farmland - so I thought I would have been classified at the vendor and the purchaser be the person who owns the farmland.
I am looking at the Title of my property.Mortgage for £212000 - 10/17 for 35 years!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!0 -
Ah! That makees sense. Sorry.
I assume then that the "the adjoining land of the Vendor which is edged green on the said plan" is the field which is now threatened with development?
Why don't you wait and see what he plans.
* it's good that he's 'friendly' and willing to discuss - but be cautious. It may well be that he knows his plans contravene the covenant but hopes a friendly approach will make you more pliant
* do not agree or disagree with anything when you meet. The less you say (beyond offering him tea and cake) the better. Listen, learn and don't commit or comment
* ask to keep a copy of his plans to consider. You can then show them to your solicitor if that's what you decide is appropriate after the meeting.
* has he applied for Planning Permission? I would check this with the council Planning office before the meeting. Knowledge is power. If he has, get hold of a copy of the plans.
* what is your aim? To prevent him building within 100 feet? To get some money in return for permitting the building? Something else?0 -
Ah! That makees sense. Sorry.
I assume then that the "the adjoining land of the Vendor which is edged green on the said plan" is the field which is now threatened with development?
Why don't you wait and see what he plans.
* it's good that he's 'friendly' and willing to discuss - but be cautious. It may well be that he knows his plans contravene the covenant but hopes a friendly approach will make you more pliant
* do not agree or disagree with anything when you meet. The less you say (beyond offering him tea and cake) the better. Listen, learn and don't commit or comment
* ask to keep a copy of his plans to consider. You can then show them to your solicitor if that's what you decide is appropriate after the meeting.
* has he applied for Planning Permission? I would check this with the council Planning office before the meeting. Knowledge is power. If he has, get hold of a copy of the plans.
* what is your aim? To prevent him building within 100 feet? To get some money in return for permitting the building? Something else?
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, part of the field is threatened with development, but it will be fairly close to my house.
My aim would be to get more garden/plot from him as we only have about 25ft behind our house, but if that fails, then I’d rather prevent any building within the 100ft as it will block my ‘countryside and field view’ which was part of the reason we bought the house.
I’ll certainly take your points on board regarding, not saying too much.
He is preparing the plans and his architect took my email to send me a copy of the plans to view - all seems like they are really trying to have me on side.Mortgage for £212000 - 10/17 for 35 years!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!0 -
The farmhouse was more likely than not sold off from the farmland generally (so as to retain the land for development purposes) so it sounds like the restrictions are applicable to the farmhouse, with the land being the 'retained land'. However, it is not really possible to understand without sight of the coloured title plan and full wording of the title register / referred to documents.0
-
Assuming your interpretation is correct...if the covenants do restrict the proposed development then I expect the developer is already fully aware of them, and will either need to avoid breaching them (or do a deal with you).0
-
chalky_white wrote: »The farmhouse was more likely than not sold off from the farmland generally (so as to retain the land for development purposes) so it sounds like the restrictions are applicable to the farmhouse, with the land being the 'retained land'. However, it is not really possible to understand without sight of the coloured title plan and full wording of the title register / referred to documents.Mortgage for £212000 - 10/17 for 35 years!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!0 -
Assuming your interpretation is correct...if the covenants do restrict the proposed development then I expect the developer is already fully aware of them, and will either need to avoid breaching them (or do a deal with you).
Thanks again.Mortgage for £212000 - 10/17 for 35 years!
Aiming to overpay each year as close to 10% as possible!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards