PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stamp Duty - that old chestnut

2

Comments

  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Doozergirl wrote: »
    SDLT is payable on the portion that you purchase.

    You're not getting it though. If you marry and you work out what your collective "pot" is rather than your individual "pots" in the case of death then you avoid it altogether. The will is needed anyway.

    This is MSE, after all.


    Am I reading that right? If we get married I avoid stamp duty altogether?


    I do get that a will is needed anyway, it's just I need to work out what's happening while we're both alive before I start worrying about what happens after we die!
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    SueC wrote: »
    Am I reading that right? If we get married I avoid stamp duty altogether?


    I do get that a will is needed anyway, it's just I need to work out what's happening while we're both alive before I start worrying about what happens after we die!

    If you get married before the purchase of the property I believe you can get your share on it during the purchase without the additional stamp duty. You count as one unit when married.

    So as one unit, you would sell his property and purchase the new property, so no additional stamp duty. (I'd be grateful if someone can confirm my thinking!)

    Without being married, when you want to purchase you share, higher rate stamp duty is due on your share.
  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Purchase of the property is due to complete in the next few weeks, with no chance of us getting married before then, so that ship's sailed. It's just the best way of me buying in at a future date that needs working out.
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,078 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    SueC wrote: »
    Purchase of the property is due to complete in the next few weeks, with no chance of us getting married before then, so that ship's sailed. It's just the best way of me buying in at a future date that needs working out.

    Before you purchase any of it, not before your partner does!
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Doozergirl wrote: »
    Before you purchase any of it, not before your partner does!


    Ooooohhhhhhh...... so......


    He buys the new house.
    I rent my house out.
    I move into his house.
    We get married.
    I buy into his house and it becomes our house.
    No stamp duty due?
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,905 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    SDLT can be due on transactions between married couples, such as wife buying a 25% share from her husband. But the good news is that if this is done after 22 November 2017 the higher rates of SDLT will not apply. So if the "chargeable consideration" is under £125,000 no SDLT will be due.


    Take it with a pinch of salt if anyone says "spouses are treated as a unit". It is not true for SDLT!


    "Chargeable consideration" is usually the sum paid and a proportion of the mortgage debt.
  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    SDLT_Geek wrote: »
    SDLT can be due on transactions between married couples, such as wife buying a 25% share from her husband. But the good news is that if this is done after 22 November 2017 the higher rates of SDLT will not apply. So if the "chargeable consideration" is under £125,000 no SDLT will be due.


    Take it with a pinch of salt if anyone says "spouses are treated as a unit". It is not true for SDLT!


    "Chargeable consideration" is usually the sum paid and a proportion of the mortgage debt.


    Thanks. I thought it sounded too good to be true!
  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    SDLT Geek - from your name I'm guessing this is your specialist subject!



    We are completely flexible re. timeframes and the order of doing things etc, is there any 'best' way to do it, or do all paths lead to the same conclusion?


    Many thanks.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,905 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    One thing not to do would be to get married before your partner's purchase. That would probably mean an extra 3% on the entire purchase price!


    Another thing to avoid would be to put in any money now to his purchase so that (even if not "on the title") you have an underlying share in the house from the start. Again that would probably bring the 3% on his head.


    If it works for you, then it might well be best for SDLT purposes to "buy into" the house only after you are married.
  • SueC_2
    SueC_2 Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    SDLT_Geek wrote: »

    Another thing to avoid would be to put in any money now to his purchase so that (even if not "on the title") you have an underlying share in the house from the start. Again that would probably bring the 3% on his head.


    That raises a couple of questions:


    - How would that ever get discovered?
    - What if I had just loaned him some money, with an offical loan agreement in place?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.