We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is LHR parking charge for collection legal?
Comments
-
twhitehousescat wrote: »security , yup a suicide bomber will pop back from hell to collect his NTK , 2 weeks later
this is one of JLA/vcs statements ,,,,,,,,security
Since neither Peel Holdings nor VCS (or any other PPC for that matter) are involved with LHR then I fail to see the relevance.0 -
unforeseen wrote: »Its probably easier to say security rather than 'you selfish tw*ts are blocking the drop off area by waiting to collect somebody'
And easier than saying we've found a new revenue stream that we can maximise.0 -
twhitehousescat wrote: »in that case the JLA case is even a bigger farce , as it covers ALL ROADS on the land
That's because they either belong to or control has been ceded to Peel Holdings0 -
-
unforeseen wrote: »That's because they either belong to or control has been ceded to Peel Holdings
and come under bylaws , which are denied by peel0 -
unforeseen wrote: »Terminals 2-5 are drop off only. I understand their reasons for preventing pickup since people do wait and they don't want that.
No. If waiting is the issue ping people for waiting not for picking up.0 -
unforeseen wrote: »Its probably easier to say security rather than 'you selfish tw*ts are blocking the drop off area by waiting to collect somebody'
Not everybody has the common sense to wait away from the area until their passenger is there.
It would make more sense to make it like Stansted where you pay regardless of the reason for using the road past the terminal building.
BTW private cars have not been able to access the front of the terminal building at JLA for years. It has been taxis and buses only for a long time.
Why would it make more sense? We already pay for the tickets and the airport tax why should I also pay to get access to the airports via roads that have probably been paid for out of taxpayers money in the first place:mad:0 -
Why would it make more sense? We already pay for the tickets and the airport tax why should I also pay to get access to the airports via roads that have probably been paid for out of taxpayers money in the first place:mad:
I don't think so, however you can say that about any council car park but it makes no difference.
Airports are a private enterprise and they can charge what they like I cringe every time I go to HR everything is a rip off.
As already said the majority of pick ups are going to be drivers looking for wandering passengers so it takes time kerching!
As for the original question yes it is legal, and your are lucky they don't charge for dropping off.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
