PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deprivation of assets by gifting?

A colleague of mine is buying a property using a gifted deposit from his parents. However his parents are in their seventies and he has been told (well, hearsay) that this might be a problem for a mortgage provider in case they need care in the future (something to do with deprivation of assets). It’s not really a lot of money compared to what they have but could this be a problem?

Comments

  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As long as it does not mean that they have deprived themselves of the money in order to avoid care fees, then it should not be a problem, afaik.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Two different things here.
    1. Mortgage companies are not in the position of policing deprivation of assets.
    2. If they are not in a position where care is on the cards, and it hasn't been done "artificially" with an eye to deliberately moving assets,such as giving their house to their son, then it doesn't count as deprivation anyway. Deprivation needs to be done deliberately not as a side effect.

    Your friend therefore is in the clear.
  • Cakeguts
    Cakeguts Posts: 7,627 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As long as they still have enough money to pay for all their care without needing the money they have given to you then there won't be a problem.
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Two different things here.
    1. Mortgage companies are not in the position of policing deprivation of assets.
    2. If they are not in a position where care is on the cards, and it hasn't been done "artificially" with an eye to deliberately moving assets,such as giving their house to their son, then it doesn't count as deprivation anyway. Deprivation needs to be done deliberately not as a side effect.

    Your friend therefore is in the clear.
    And 3, even if it *was* deprivation of assets, the practical effect of such an assessment is simply that the person who has deprived themselves of assets by giving them away is treated for means testing as if they still had the assets. This doesn't give the means testing agency, or ther person who made the gift, any legal right to 'get the money back'.

    So, on a practical level the mortgage company doesn't have major worries (unless the debt is a massive LTV) because in such circumstances if the mortgage borrower decides they want to voluntarily return the gift, they'll have to finance that independently themselves and the mortgage company still has its full security over the property.
  • elonii
    elonii Posts: 62 Forumite
    Deprivation of assets would be an issue only at the point where your colleague's parents actually needed care. They're allowed to spend their money as they please until then. If, on the other hand, they found out they had health issues that meant care was an imminent requirement and started giving money away and taking first class flights around the world - they'd be on a sticky wicket down the track.

    All the mortgage company should require is evidence that the money is a gift and all will be well.
  • betsie
    betsie Posts: 434 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    My mum is in care and most of her fees are paid by the local council now. When we had the social services financial review they only looked at the last 5 yrs.
    I think it would only be a problem if either parent already has a diagnosis of Alz/dementia or other condition which is likely to mean they will need outside care. If both are fine it is not illegal to spend your money how you want too.
    Not every old person ends up in a carehome.
  • lookstraightahead
    lookstraightahead Posts: 5,558 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thank you all for your advice, mich appreciated .
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.