We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Deprivation of assets by gifting?

lookstraightahead
Posts: 5,558 Forumite

A colleague of mine is buying a property using a gifted deposit from his parents. However his parents are in their seventies and he has been told (well, hearsay) that this might be a problem for a mortgage provider in case they need care in the future (something to do with deprivation of assets). It’s not really a lot of money compared to what they have but could this be a problem?
0
Comments
-
As long as it does not mean that they have deprived themselves of the money in order to avoid care fees, then it should not be a problem, afaik.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
Two different things here.
1. Mortgage companies are not in the position of policing deprivation of assets.
2. If they are not in a position where care is on the cards, and it hasn't been done "artificially" with an eye to deliberately moving assets,such as giving their house to their son, then it doesn't count as deprivation anyway. Deprivation needs to be done deliberately not as a side effect.
Your friend therefore is in the clear.0 -
As long as they still have enough money to pay for all their care without needing the money they have given to you then there won't be a problem.0
-
AnotherJoe wrote: »Two different things here.
1. Mortgage companies are not in the position of policing deprivation of assets.
2. If they are not in a position where care is on the cards, and it hasn't been done "artificially" with an eye to deliberately moving assets,such as giving their house to their son, then it doesn't count as deprivation anyway. Deprivation needs to be done deliberately not as a side effect.
Your friend therefore is in the clear.
So, on a practical level the mortgage company doesn't have major worries (unless the debt is a massive LTV) because in such circumstances if the mortgage borrower decides they want to voluntarily return the gift, they'll have to finance that independently themselves and the mortgage company still has its full security over the property.0 -
Deprivation of assets would be an issue only at the point where your colleague's parents actually needed care. They're allowed to spend their money as they please until then. If, on the other hand, they found out they had health issues that meant care was an imminent requirement and started giving money away and taking first class flights around the world - they'd be on a sticky wicket down the track.
All the mortgage company should require is evidence that the money is a gift and all will be well.0 -
My mum is in care and most of her fees are paid by the local council now. When we had the social services financial review they only looked at the last 5 yrs.
I think it would only be a problem if either parent already has a diagnosis of Alz/dementia or other condition which is likely to mean they will need outside care. If both are fine it is not illegal to spend your money how you want too.
Not every old person ends up in a carehome.0 -
Thank you all for your advice, mich appreciated .0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards