We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fence Issue with Building Company

Selina2017
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hello,
My partner and I bought a new build last year. We understood from the builders that there would be a fence behind our parking spaces (2 cars wide). Our neighbour has the same house (mirror image of ours) and has a fence behind his parking spaces (2 cars long). We have mentioned this to the builder when we had the handover but they have refused to comment. There is a building site at the back of our house and the builder had asked us to give them access through our parking area. We granted them access via a lease hoping that once they were done, they would put up a fence.
Now they don't need any access through our parking spaces and are saying that there is no fence and are therefore refusing to put one up. They said that we should have checked the plans for the fences. The sales office and solicitor have been very unhelpful.
Without a fence, people will use our parking area to drive through to get access to the flats behind the houses (although there is another route). Also, when we bought the house, it was still in construction and therefore, we could not physically see any fence. The sales team that sold the property to us said that we would have a fence just like our neighbour but the sales team is gone and there is no record of that conversation. The builders website shows the plans for the houses and the flats and the boundaries are not reflective of the legal plans. We are now being asked to pay for a 'licence to alter' before we put up a fence at our own cost. In the contract, there is a clause to say that we cannot erect any structure without the builder's consent and that the builder can change the plans as deemed fit.
Is this not unfair treatment of customers (our neighbour has a fence and we don't)? It seems that the contract was drafted in the seller's favour and not in the buyer's
How can we resolve this? Thank you.
My partner and I bought a new build last year. We understood from the builders that there would be a fence behind our parking spaces (2 cars wide). Our neighbour has the same house (mirror image of ours) and has a fence behind his parking spaces (2 cars long). We have mentioned this to the builder when we had the handover but they have refused to comment. There is a building site at the back of our house and the builder had asked us to give them access through our parking area. We granted them access via a lease hoping that once they were done, they would put up a fence.
Now they don't need any access through our parking spaces and are saying that there is no fence and are therefore refusing to put one up. They said that we should have checked the plans for the fences. The sales office and solicitor have been very unhelpful.
Without a fence, people will use our parking area to drive through to get access to the flats behind the houses (although there is another route). Also, when we bought the house, it was still in construction and therefore, we could not physically see any fence. The sales team that sold the property to us said that we would have a fence just like our neighbour but the sales team is gone and there is no record of that conversation. The builders website shows the plans for the houses and the flats and the boundaries are not reflective of the legal plans. We are now being asked to pay for a 'licence to alter' before we put up a fence at our own cost. In the contract, there is a clause to say that we cannot erect any structure without the builder's consent and that the builder can change the plans as deemed fit.
Is this not unfair treatment of customers (our neighbour has a fence and we don't)? It seems that the contract was drafted in the seller's favour and not in the buyer's

How can we resolve this? Thank you.
0
Comments
-
Generally, statutory protection about unfair contracts doesn't apply when buying property on the basis that you would normally have the benefit of independent legal advice before entering into the contract (and an opportunity to negotiate its terms, though in practice it can be more a question of your solicitor warning you what it all means). If it was important to you that the developers erect a fence then you ought to have tried to put it in the contract.0
-
What do you have in writing to say there would be a fence?0
-
Seems to me you need to put these at the far end of your parking spaceAn answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......0
-
.... or a row of big plant pots.
That'll stop people using your drive as a rat run until you get this sorted.0 -
When we bought our new build we kept copies of the house and site leaflets, which clearly show all of the fences. If you don't have yours, perhaps one your neighbours has a copy you could have a look at?0
-
Silvertabby wrote: ».... or a row of big plant pots.
That'll stop people using your drive as a rat run until you get this sorted.
Or a garden bench - with the seat bit turned facing your garden perhaps?
Or a handy hosepipe obviously used for watering your garden and possibly used at "suitable" times when you coincidentally decide to water your garden?
Or a couple of those HUGE ornamental stones (like a couple of feet high and massive)?
Or a chainlink fence (with padlocks if need be)?0 -
I wonder, did you use the builder's recommended solicitor?
The comments that focus on the contract you hold are the most relevant here.
People often think that buying a new-build is less risky than purchasing an older, lived-in home. Like buying a new car or other substantial consumer product, sales staff are pleasant and reassuring, so it's easy to be lulled into a false sense of security.
The reality is that some new builds are badly-built, thrown-together by people on piece work who don't care about quality. Stressed site managers with targets to meet, won't necessarily want to hand over a free fence either, if they can avoid it.
Your contract is vital. You are entitled to what's written down. All the fancy site plans and promo material are subject to changes. Even if you find one, I fear it will count for nothing.
Sorry!0 -
Unfortunately, there is no document that talks about a fence. The plans of the site shows no fence behind our parking area and that of our neighbour but then the builder erected a fence on his property.
We did use the builder's recommended solicitor and we did think that they sided with the builder on some matters. They would else they will lose future business from the builder.
The contract says that we should not erect any structure or building on the property once completed. We are trying to find out whether legally a fence (wooden, 1.8 m high) is a structure.
Would it make sense to appeal through a first tier court?0 -
Is there any detail on the builder's planning permission for the estate that might be helpful to you? Check with your local council what was approved.0
-
We do have a clause that states "not to do anything which is or may become a nuisance or danger to the Transferor or any owner of a dwelling on the estate". This is a standard clause in the contract. People using our parking space (walking/driving), making us liable for damage, security of our cars could be a nuisance/danger.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards