Attendance notice

twhitehousescat

lets go back a page

read this
https://www.dropbox.com/s/243896uf0x97y0a/Photo%2022-05-2018%2C%2014%2010%2016.jpg?dl=0

"carried out without our knowledge or instructions"

the bailiff Co state they were asked to collect moneys , but "accidentally" thought this was a court thing , but yet UKCPS deny sending info to them

who's got the longest nose?

Umkomaas

Curiouser and curiouser, cried Alice!

twhitehousescat

the truth is out there moulder ,,,,,,,,,,,

but in true PPC style , wash , rinse , apply whitewash and place under carpet

those two letters should result in criminal action , but will it ,,,,,

the bailiff Co could NOT have acted without UKCPS hiring them

waamo

Subject Access Requests all round. Who has the fastest shredder?

twhitehousescat

waamo wrote: »

Subject Access Requests all round. Who has the fastest shredder?

the IPC


with those 2 letters clearly shown perhaps herbie can advise

Coupon-mad

Hang on, but Mr Golec said HIMSELF in a recorded phone call ''I am a bailiff but I wasn't yesterday''.

If he believed he was doing an 'attendance notice round' of collections that day, he would NOT have said the above.

This ALL needs passing to Trading Standards. Someone is lying.

twhitehousescat

however the illegal figure quoted was to be paid to the company(please ring / pay etc) not him , so this was not the action of a rogue bailiff

the figue quoted was made up by the company , that accept they sent him out

its a case of grab what you can by bully methods until caught , we know of three cases , how many paid up ?

UKCPS who in the past have used tame debt collectors chose this company for a fast income boost , offering he company far far more than the normal 10% cut

pass the buck , it stinks and nothing will be done

maffb7

Looks like case closed then? Sad that know one else has come forward with the same letter and the 1st post 'tomwig' hasn't been in touch. Looks like they'll still be able to twist the law and do what they want!

twhitehousescat

no the case is NOT closed , the bailiff company have admitted fault , and you are yet to find out HOW they got your info , it did not appear in a puff of smoke , but yet the parking Co deny handing it over

more help needed on wording of SARs to relevant parties and to be compared to letters they sent , before a full blown complaint to relevant governing bodies

Coupon-mad

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Hang on, but Mr Golec said HIMSELF in a recorded phone call ''I am a bailiff but I wasn't yesterday''.

If he believed he was doing an 'attendance notice round' of collections that day, he would NOT have said the above.

This ALL needs passing to Trading Standards. Someone is lying.

As above, there is LOADS more action to be taken by you, maffb7.