We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

FSCS protection before house purchase

I believe I am correct that FSCS protection extends beyond £85k temporarily, in circumstances such as a large deposit from a deceased's estate or from the proceeds of the sale of a house.

Does the same apply when temporarily increasing an account balance prior to purchasing a house?
(Nearly) dunroving

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 30 March 2018 at 8:55PM
    Yes.
    Proceeds resulting from the following life events are categorised as temporary high balances:


    Sums paid to the depositor in respect of:
    • Real estate transactions (property purchase, sale proceeds, equity release)
    • Benefits payable under an insurance policy
    • Personal injury compensation (unlimited amount)
    • Disability or incapacity (state benefits)
    • Claim for compensation for wrongful conviction
    • Claim for compensation for unfair dismissal
    • Redundancy (voluntary or compulsory)
    • Marriage or civil partnership
    • Divorce or dissolution of their civil partnership
    • Benefits payable on retirement
    • Benefits payable on death
    • A claim for compensation in respect of a person's death
    • Inheritance
    • Proceeds of a deceased's estate held by their Personal Representative
    https://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/compensation-limits/deposit-limits/
  • ValiantSon
    ValiantSon Posts: 2,586 Forumite
    dunroving wrote: »
    I believe I am correct that FSCS protection extends beyond £85k temporarily, in circumstances such as a large deposit from a deceased's estate or from the proceeds of the sale of a house.

    Does the same apply when temporarily increasing an account balance prior to purchasing a house?

    What is the source of the funds? If it is one of those listed in the post above, then yes, but if it is simply you moving existing savings from other accounts, then no. The first item on the list refers to proceeds from a property transaction, not moving funds to prepare to make a property transaction.
  • AirlieBird
    AirlieBird Posts: 1,046 Forumite
    ValiantSon wrote: »
    What is the source of the funds? If it is one of those listed in the post above, then yes, but if it is simply you moving existing savings from other accounts, then no. The first item on the list refers to proceeds from a property transaction, not moving funds to prepare to make a property transaction.

    The temporary high balance covers funds placed in an account in preparation for a house purchase, providing evidence is provided by the conveyancer or estate agent detailing the offer made and the status of the offer on the day the bank failed.
    Did you really mean to put loose?
    Lose: no longer possess, not to retain, unable to find
    Loose: not firmly or tightly fixed in place
  • ValiantSon
    ValiantSon Posts: 2,586 Forumite
    AirlieBird wrote: »
    The temporary high balance covers funds placed in an account in preparation for a house purchase, providing evidence is provided by the conveyancer or estate agent detailing the offer made and the status of the offer on the day the bank failed.

    If that is the case then it isn't explained on the FSCS website, but I am happy to stand corrected.
  • dunroving
    dunroving Posts: 1,903 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sounds like "Yes, definitely maybe", then. ;-)

    I read through that list and they all read as transactions in which the account holder is the recipient of money from some other entity.

    In terms of the first, it seems more a case such as a solicitor receiving funds necessary to proceed a house purchase. My concern is that "paying myself" to enable a simpler transaction to the solicitor wouldn't be covered.

    The money for my house purchase is in multiple accounts, some of which are savings accounts. It is much simpler to pay from these to my current account than to another party (solicitor ). I could then transfer easily to the solicitor in one lump from my current account.
    (Nearly) dunroving
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.