We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Garage Conversion
Comments
-
Doozergirl wrote: »Not without planning permission.
A home office is incidental to the dwelling, a bedroom is not and it would have to be considered separately.
Did your pre application advice tell you that your proposed office fell under Permitted Development? I presume that is the case if you are already building.
A bedroom does need full planning permission.
Erm, no it doesnt.
Unless when the property was built the pd rights were removed, you dont need permission to convert the garage into a bedroom.
So long as the bedroom is "incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse" as outlined in the GPDO it doesnt need permission.0 -
parking_question_chap wrote: »Unless when the property was built the pd rights were removed, you dont need permission to convert the garage into a bedroom.
So long as the bedroom is "incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse" as outlined in the GPDO it doesnt need permission.
Doozergirl is correct. "Incidental to the enjoyment" should be read as excluding activities which would normally be expected to take place in the dwellinghouse itself. The subject often comes up in appeals, there are some grey areas (e.g. home cinemas/games rooms) but the position on additional bedrooms is clear.Perhaps the most important constraint on Permitted Development within this Class of Part 1 in the GPDO is the purpose for which the outbuilding is being erected. The wording of the Order is quite restrictive; it only permits the erection of such a building if it is “required for a purpose incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse as such”. The term ‘incidental’ as used here has been held to exclude purposes which are part of the primary residential use of the property, so a free-standing building to provide extra sleeping accommodation, extra living space, and/or a kitchen, etc. are not permitted by this part of the GPDO. http://planninglawblog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/permitted-development-for-outbuildings.html
The following is a direct quote from a Planning Inspector:-“Class E of the GPDO does not permit the erection of outbuildings for use as additional residential accommodation of the sort which would normally be found in a house, for example as an additional bedroom or living room. It is therefore appropriate to examine the reasons for development being "required" under Class E - otherwise the GPDO would be open to abuse by sham proposals, involving buildings being constructed for one stated purpose and then being used for another purpose.” http://www.permitteddevelopment.org/Incidental-Use-Appeal-Decisions.php
I.e. Someone converts a garage into a home office, then installs a bathroom and kitchen, then sells the 'home office' as a self-contained home."In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
Doozergirl is correct. "Incidental to the enjoyment" should be read as excluding activities which would normally be expected to take place in the dwellinghouse itself. The subject often comes up in appeals, there are some grey areas (e.g. home cinemas/games rooms) but the position on additional bedrooms is clear.
The following is a direct quote from a Planning Inspector:-
I.e. Someone converts a garage into a home office, then installs a bathroom and kitchen, then sells the 'home office' as a self-contained home.
ok, will take your word for that, sounds complicated.0 -
parking_question_chap wrote: »ok, will take your word for that, sounds complicated.
I'm sure it can appear complicated if you haven't dealt with this sort of thing for a living for the last two decades.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
parking_question_chap wrote: »ok, will take your word for that, sounds complicated.
In a previous life I worked in an area where people employed expensive planning consultants to justify the building of all kinds of elaborate 'incidental' facilites which everyone knew were destined to become the living quarters for the au-pair. A 'pool house' with a basic kitchen, toilet, shower room and storage space is 99% of the way to becoming an au-pair flat. Most planning authorities will be wise to such things"In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards