We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

CCJ set aside

123457»

Comments

  • I received in the post today two pieces of paper from the CCBC.
    They are:
    1. General Directions Order
    2. General form of judgment or order

    They state...

    General Directions Order:
    Upon the court noting that the defendant did not receive the separate particulars of claim:
    It is ordered that:
    1. Judgment is set aside
    2. The claim is stayed

    Note: This order has been made without a hearing under the Court's case management powers contained in the Civil Procedure rules Part 3. You may within 7 days of the service of this order, apply to the Court to set aside or to vary the order under Part 23 Rule 10. You must file with the Court, and server on the other parties, an application that sets out your reasons for objection. A fee is payable upon the filing of the application. When your objection is received the matter will be listed for hearing unless you ask the Court to vary the order without a hearing.

    General form of judgment or order:
    Before Deputy District Judge xxxx sitting at the [CCBC]

    IT IS ORDERED THAT

    the judgment against [little old me] dated [date] be and is hereby set aside.


    I spoke to CCBC on today before the letter had arrived as I wanted an update.
    They were not confidence inspiring as they thought I was calling about my set aside application, although they had on my notes that I spoke with them 2 weeks ago about why the set aside application had been rejected and returned to me.
    They then said that CEL had applied to set it aside and when I questioned that the lady was not so sure and just said it had been set aside. She then got the dates wrong for when things had happened but I was relieved when she said a copy of the Order had been sent to me.

    So, I suppose I have to wait now to see if CEL decide to have another go at this.
    Is that what the 7 days relates to; so if I don't hear anything by then I can assume it's all done with?
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My understanding is that the 'seven days' mentioned is the time allow for either you or the claimant to object to the order that the court has made. Nothing more.
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Great stuff! Let's not forget this can work well in any set aside case:
    Originally Posted by IamEmanresu
    Watching this one as it may be the Courts acting on some of the possible recommendations about default CCJ.

    Perhaps the first line on any set-aside could be the lack of POC as the main reason for a default CCJ to be set-aside AND the costs being paid by the Claimant. The issue would then be for a judge to look at the PoC and if deficient, it will be a rubber stamped win with costs for the defendant.
    Good idea, let's remember to do that in future set aside Witness Statements.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • My understanding is that the 'seven days' mentioned is the time allow for either you or the claimant to object to the order that the court has made. Nothing more.
    Thanks KeithP

    I'll be on my guard then :-)
  • Coupon-mad wrote: »
    Great stuff! Let's not forget this can work well in any set aside case:

    Yes, a relief and without having to pay out anything, other than more grey hair and fewer hours sleep recently.
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks KeithP

    I'll be on my guard then :-)
    Should be easy to follow.

    See those words "and serve on the other parties"?
    That means that if the claimant objects to the court's decision, then they must let you know about their objection too.

    That's if they follow the rules... but we know they don't. :D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.