We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying from relative, ex-partner, repossession.
Options
Comments
-
Radical idea time (...maybe. I give credit to anyone that mentioned things on this theme.)
I've read the documents, and could p*** a mortgage for the arrears, from anyone, tomorrow.
The biggest crux of the matter is the ex being on the deeds. The options for removing them are:
-Their signature.
-Their death certificate.
-Repossession.
Basically, #3 offers the simplest route.
So my crazy idea is to, with full cooperation all around of the lender and my relative, allow repossession of the property on the proviso that I immediately purchase it.
Do we think this seems reasonable and/or realistic?
The only caveat in this is that the lender is very big and very faceless bank. I can't imagine an actual human being assigned any practical part of the matter; so it would likely be referred to a computer that will simply suffer a stack overflow and break.
I suppose the next question is, do I contact the lender, or their legal representatives (who may be disinterested, but are at least people)?0 -
Radical idea time (...maybe. I give credit to anyone that mentioned things on this theme.)
I've read the documents, and could p*** a mortgage for the arrears, from anyone, tomorrow.
The biggest crux of the matter is the ex being on the deeds. The options for removing them are:
-Their signature.
-Their death certificate.
-Repossession.
Basically, #3 offers the simplest route.
So my crazy idea is to, with full cooperation all around of the lender and my relative, allow repossession of the property on the proviso that I immediately purchase it.
Do we think this seems reasonable and/or realistic?
The only caveat in this is that the lender is very big and very faceless bank. I can't imagine an actual human being assigned any practical part of the matter; so it would likely be referred to a computer that will simply suffer a stack overflow and break.
I suppose the next question is, do I contact the lender, or their legal representatives (who may be disinterested, but are at least people)?
Radical Reality Check Time
I don't know what documents you have read and I presume the missing letters are 'iss' but you're not suggesting that you can get a mortgage just for the arrears are you?
It's not for you, or your relative, to allow the repossession, a Judge will decide that at the upcoming hearing. You are also not in a position to put any conditions on it i.e. you must be allowed to buy it immediately.
If the possession order is granted, the sale of the property will follow due process and will likely be sold at auction. However, it will probably be given to an EA to market it once a valuation has taken place.
As you will have prior knowledge that it will be coming onto the market, you will be well placed to get an offer in first. If it was to be sold at auction, you would have to offer above the guide price for the lender to accept a pre-auction bid.0 -
-
So my crazy idea is to, with full cooperation all around of the lender and my relative, allow repossession of the property on the proviso that I immediately purchase it.
Do we think this seems reasonable and/or realistic?
No, it is, like you say, crazy. As we've already explained, repossession means your relative being evicted and the bank putting the property on the open market. You can of course offer for it, but there's no guarantee you'll get it. And your relative will need somewhere else to live at least for the duration of marketing and completing the sale.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards