Random criminal question!!!!!!!!!!

emsywoo123

Sallylizzie wrote: »

My sister's in the police (MIU) and she says that when Ian Huntley was found guilty of his murdering Jessica and Holly this is when the enhancement check was brought back into light again , as he had already been arrested but not charged with incidents involving children under age. Had it been included on his check he may never have gotten the job.. She says it is down to the boss man but it depends on the nature of the alleged crime. However she says it is perfectally ok to call your local station not 999 or owt:rotfl: And ask as it's for an essay and it's important you have the facts correct.
I know I've phoned my local to ask for clarification on bb guns as my neighbour had one ( he's 8) and threatened my DS with it ( such a nice child!!my neighbour) so.. That's my 2 peneth worth, Do with it as you will!
Good luck

Ooooo this is tricky-from a maternal point of view I agree with it, but I struggle that innocent people could potentially be discriminated against because of an alleged offence.

beard0609

Hi sorry that didn't answer your question specifically but (may get this wrong so bear with me).. once you have been arrested and charged the details are on the system (as you have an arrest summonds number) then you may be found (for example) not guilty or the case is discontinued by the cps all these are a disposal of the case so it would already be on the system and will therefore stay.. as (sorry couldn't get the quote to work) has been said already the police have taken your fingerprints and dna and photo

emsywoo123

beard0609 wrote: »

Hi sorry that didn't answer your question specifically but (may get this wrong so bear with me).. once you have been arrested and charged the details are on the system (as you have an arrest summonds number) then you may be found (for example) not guilty or the case is discontinued by the cps all these are a disposal of the case so it would already be on the system and will therefore stay.. as (sorry couldn't get the quote to work) has been said already the police have taken your fingerprints and dna and photo

God I am really naive, I thought if it was dropped, then vamooosh it would be gone from "the system!"

[Deleted User]

emsywoo123 wrote: »

Ooooo this is tricky-from a maternal point of view I agree with it, but I struggle that innocent people could potentially be discriminated against because of an alleged offence.

Oh yes I agree. I really think you should talk to the police them selves and at least you'll be 100% sure. But let me know weaht the answer is now cos I'm interested!

emsywoo123

Sallylizzie wrote: »

Oh yes I agree. I really think you should talk to the police them selves and at least you'll be 100% sure. But let me know weaht the answer is now cos I'm interested!

I am going to march myself into a police station tomorrow!! Might try a solicitor as well, they know stuff about stuff don't they?!

[Deleted User]

emsywoo123 wrote: »

I am going to march myself into a police station tomorrow!! Might try a solicitor as well, they know stuff about stuff don't they?!

Hehe.. thats funny but seriously I would! I always thought if it was dropped due to lack of evidence It wouldn't get to court ( I may be niaeve (SP)
If a crime is dropped for lack of evidence then it would stay on the system but listed as no further action. Unless ( my opinion here) you're proved guilty then it couldn't be put on any check as it would be classed as discrimination as you're not guilty!
Sorry I'm prob being no help am i??

Alfie_E

emsywoo123 wrote: »

I am going to march myself into a police station tomorrow!!

It might be better to start at the top, rather than the bottom. How about the Information Commissioner’s Office? If they don’t know, no-one’s going to know.

emsywoo123

Sallylizzie wrote: »

Hehe.. thats funny but seriously I would! I always thought if it was dropped due to lack of evidence It wouldn't get to court ( I may be niaeve (SP)
If a crime is dropped for lack of evidence then it would stay on the system but listed as no further action. Unless ( my opinion here) you're proved guilty then it couldn't be put on any check as it would be classed as discrimination as you're not guilty!
Sorry I'm prob being no help am i??

LOL no you are not but you are making me laugh cos you are as clueless as me!! :rotfl: :rotfl:
I think the problem arises as working with children requires an enhanced CRB check...........oh what am I talking about, I am more muddled now then when I started!
I will report back tomorrow!:T

emsywoo123

Alfie_E wrote: »

It might be better to start at the top, rather than the bottom. How about the Information Commissioner’s Office? If they don’t know, no-one’s going to know.

Ooo I like your style, straight to the top of the tree-this is good!

[Deleted User]

emsywoo123 wrote: »

LOL no you are not but you are making me laugh cos you are as clueless as me!! :rotfl: :rotfl:
I think the problem arises as working with children requires an enhanced CRB check...........oh what am I talking about, I am more muddled now then when I started!
I will report back tomorrow!:T

I am clueless aren't I but I do want to know what you find out. Can I ask what you're studying?