We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Indigo ARE still getting details from DVLA...
mirrormermaid
Posts: 11 Forumite
I received a Penalty Notice from a Railway car park, issued by Indigo Park Solutions.
On the Newbie pages, one of the Q&As indicates that "Indigo are not requesting DVLA data for these. Therefore, ignore a windscreen penalty from indigo (only if the location was a railway car park) and wait and see if they issue a notice to keeper at all. Then if they do, appeal as keeper using the template below. It seems likely you will hear nothing, in which case, do nothing."
I did nothing initially and have today received a Notice to Owner!!!8230;.
The advice on the Q&A is to appeal. My question is, should I use the TEMPLATE ''ONE SIZE FITS ALL'' FIRST APPEAL THAT DOESN'T SAY WHO WAS DRIVING template?
ps I today contacted the DVLA with a Vehicle Subject Request.
On the Newbie pages, one of the Q&As indicates that "Indigo are not requesting DVLA data for these. Therefore, ignore a windscreen penalty from indigo (only if the location was a railway car park) and wait and see if they issue a notice to keeper at all. Then if they do, appeal as keeper using the template below. It seems likely you will hear nothing, in which case, do nothing."
I did nothing initially and have today received a Notice to Owner!!!8230;.
The advice on the Q&A is to appeal. My question is, should I use the TEMPLATE ''ONE SIZE FITS ALL'' FIRST APPEAL THAT DOESN'T SAY WHO WAS DRIVING template?
ps I today contacted the DVLA with a Vehicle Subject Request.
0
Comments
-
you now write and send this letter tomorrow
send this , I have added a couple of extra lines to it
just fill your VRN and dates (a few before and a few after"
Example Letter
[Your Address]
DVLA Vehicle Record Enquiries section
Longview Road
Morriston
Swansea
SA99 1AJ
Dear Sirs
Re: VRM AB12 XYZ
As the Registered Keeper of the above VRM could you advise who has accessed my personal details with regards to this marque, how often and when did the DVLA send the keeper details out. also by what method (form) and reason. Please advise the information with regards to events between xx/xx/xx/ and xx/xx/xx.
I understand there is no charge for this information and look forward to your speedy reply.
Yours faithfully
<signed>
followup will be dependent on there replySave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Thanks, I emailed the DVLA with the request today, so will await their response
0 -
did you sign your email?Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Just signed off with name0
-
in ink ,
anyone , but anyone could be using any email address
DATA PROTECTION
do it by post with your full name and address , as they have this on fileSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Have you seen this?
http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41x
This bbill is likely pas pass into law in the Autumn. Please wiit to your MP in robust terms complaining about this invasion of your pprivacy.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
I get a server error when I click on that link - is there an updated link, do you know?0
-
You'll find that link on pretty much every other thread.
Here it is again:
http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41
The 'x' on the end has thrown it.
The Deep would probably argue that one little 'x' on the end is de minimis.
0 -
it has been shown over and over again that in railway cases , INDIGO are NOT getting info from DVLA , they are letting ZZPS do all the work0
-
twhitehousescat wrote: »it has been shown over and over again that in railway cases , INDIGO are NOT getting info from DVLA , they are letting ZZPS do all the work
Has it? Have you got a link(s) you can share?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards