We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Quaker Oats comp!
Options
Comments
-
Wonder if Quaker are surreptitiously trying to attract food bloggers as a form of cheaper advertising.I need to think of something new here...0
-
Why shouldn!!!8217;t a food blogger enter though. So long as the t&sc are kept to then I don!!!8217;t see the problem who enters after all it is a big value prize so is going to attract many entries.
I do feel that there is quite a lot of sour grapes regarding this competition from some compers we don!!!8217;t have exclusivity to competitions so if entering maybe do some research on food blogs photos to up your game.0 -
https://www.facebook.com/QuakerOatsUK/photos/a.284846468263736.66659.233221876759529/1606647082750328/?type=3&theater
Seems it a professional again from some of the comments on https://www.instagram.com/p/Bfi62CglJhq/?taken-by=quakeroatsukJan Wins: .0 -
Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.
You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.0 -
flipflop29 wrote: »Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.
You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.
I wonder if the company will address this?Jan Wins: .0 -
flipflop29 wrote: »Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.
You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.
There is an independent judge and the T&Cs mean the deciding factor is likely to be the "visually appealing" section (for instance how hard would it be to get top marks in the "practical to make" section) and a professional quality image should come out ahead of a less than perfect one when everything else is equal.
Only Quaker will know if it was by design or happy accident for them that the T&Cs worked out that way.0 -
Makeandsave wrote: »I wonder if the company will address this?
They haven't so far. Not publicly, anyway.
Bit disappointing. It's not that the person who won was professional, it's that they've used someone else's photo AND it's been published before. Clear contravention of the rules,0 -
Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case. A lot of people could end up disillusioned with the brand rather than being more positively brand aware.
Also, if Quaker use all the Pro quality images they will just look like yet another professional ad, which personally I find my brain pretty much filters out. I saw an entry on facebook where someone had put a freddy the frog in a bowl of porridge, and hey their kid loved it. Hardly food blogger quality, but guess what it's the one stuck in the brain of most people who saw it. And it's the stuff I see that I think, yeah I could do that, quite easily that inspires me. I'm not going to go out and buy fresh figs and a honeycomb for my brekky in all honesty...2018 - £562 2019 - £130 2020 - £276 2021 - £106 2022 - £1400 -
Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case.
Non-photographers do have as much chance as anyone for the £1,000 prize in the final draw which is randomEntries received between 00.01 GMT on 12th March 2018 and 23.59 GMT on 12th June 20180 -
Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case. A lot of people could end up disillusioned with the brand rather than being more positively brand aware.
Also, if Quaker use all the Pro quality images they will just look like yet another professional ad, which personally I find my brain pretty much filters out. I saw an entry on facebook where someone had put a freddy the frog in a bowl of porridge, and hey their kid loved it. Hardly food blogger quality, but guess what it's the one stuck in the brain of most people who saw it. And it's the stuff I see that I think, yeah I could do that, quite easily that inspires me. I'm not going to go out and buy fresh figs and a honeycomb for my brekky in all honesty...2018 wins-12wins0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards