We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Quaker Oats comp!

Options
24

Comments

  • NBLondon
    NBLondon Posts: 5,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Wonder if Quaker are surreptitiously trying to attract food bloggers as a form of cheaper advertising.
    I need to think of something new here...
  • Why shouldn!!!8217;t a food blogger enter though. So long as the t&sc are kept to then I don!!!8217;t see the problem who enters after all it is a big value prize so is going to attract many entries.
    I do feel that there is quite a lot of sour grapes regarding this competition from some compers we don!!!8217;t have exclusivity to competitions so if entering maybe do some research on food blogs photos to up your game.
  • Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.

    You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.
  • flipflop29 wrote: »
    Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.

    You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.

    I wonder if the company will address this?
    Jan Wins: .
  • mjm3346
    mjm3346 Posts: 47,264 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    flipflop29 wrote: »
    Didn't even take the photo herself apparently.

    You can't stop people with specific skills entering competitions, fair enough. But this one has got a bit daft.

    There is an independent judge and the T&Cs mean the deciding factor is likely to be the "visually appealing" section (for instance how hard would it be to get top marks in the "practical to make" section) and a professional quality image should come out ahead of a less than perfect one when everything else is equal.

    Only Quaker will know if it was by design or happy accident for them that the T&Cs worked out that way.
  • I wonder if the company will address this?

    They haven't so far. Not publicly, anyway.

    Bit disappointing. It's not that the person who won was professional, it's that they've used someone else's photo AND it's been published before. Clear contravention of the rules,
  • hdh74
    hdh74 Posts: 2,872 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case. A lot of people could end up disillusioned with the brand rather than being more positively brand aware.
    Also, if Quaker use all the Pro quality images they will just look like yet another professional ad, which personally I find my brain pretty much filters out. I saw an entry on facebook where someone had put a freddy the frog in a bowl of porridge, and hey their kid loved it. Hardly food blogger quality, but guess what it's the one stuck in the brain of most people who saw it. And it's the stuff I see that I think, yeah I could do that, quite easily that inspires me. I'm not going to go out and buy fresh figs and a honeycomb for my brekky in all honesty...
    2018 - £562  2019 - £130 2020 - £276  2021 - £106 2022 - £140
  • mjm3346
    mjm3346 Posts: 47,264 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    hdh74 wrote: »
    Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case.



    Non-photographers do have as much chance as anyone for the £1,000 prize in the final draw which is random
    Entries received between 00.01 GMT on 12th March 2018 and 23.59 GMT on 12th June 2018
  • Blueyez
    Blueyez Posts: 2,983 Forumite
    hdh74 wrote: »
    Don't bedgrudge the winners as any fair entry is a deserving winner imo. Do think Quaker have run it poorly though. The TV ads make it look like anyone with a bowl of porridge and a phone or camera could win. Which certainly doesn't seem to be the case. A lot of people could end up disillusioned with the brand rather than being more positively brand aware.
    Also, if Quaker use all the Pro quality images they will just look like yet another professional ad, which personally I find my brain pretty much filters out. I saw an entry on facebook where someone had put a freddy the frog in a bowl of porridge, and hey their kid loved it. Hardly food blogger quality, but guess what it's the one stuck in the brain of most people who saw it. And it's the stuff I see that I think, yeah I could do that, quite easily that inspires me. I'm not going to go out and buy fresh figs and a honeycomb for my brekky in all honesty...
    I remember seeing the frog one! I only looked through the comp after seeing this thread appear, didn't enter as I don't buy the product due to allergy. its a shame they won't at least pick a mix of professional and 'everyday users of the product as a compromise.
    2018 wins-12wins
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.