We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Prolific Academic Survey Alerts
Comments
-
Prolific specifically forbid researchers to screen participants during a survey:
https://researcher-help.prolific.co/hc/en-gb/articles/360010165173-Can-I-screen-participants-within-my-survey-
Can I screen participants within my survey?
No, you can only screen participants out of your survey based on criteria which are specified using Prolific's prescreening options.
By this, we mean that the full eligibility criteria for your study must be applied to your prescreening, so that all participants who are sent to your study can complete it and receive the reward. You can not simply reject participants if they do not meet the criteria you're looking for, or exit them from your survey, if the criteria wasn't applied to your prescreening.
So I'd report any researcher who asks screening questions, or includes text in the instructions like 'Only complete this survey if you....'
These questions are completely different to attention checks.
PA also say
Participants inappropriately screened out of a study should not have their submission rejected, and will require payment.
I didn't realise this! I think I'll be contacting the researcher who screened me out of the Paris network study!0 -
Saving money on purchases online (B3)
Hosted by Jonathan Millward
£0.26 3 minutes £5.20/hr 100 places remainingI work within the voluntary sector, supporting vulnerable people to rebuild their lives.
I love my job0 -
Learning and Remembering Words
Hosted by Nicole Mirea
£3.97
30 minutes £7.94/hr 10 places remainingApparently, everybody knows that the bird is [strike]the word[/strike] a moorhen0 -
Just got paid £15 for a skype interview that lasted just over an hour.
Happy bunny.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Mind & Morality
Hosted by Michael Laakasuo
£3.00 35 minutes £5.15/hr 390 places remaining0 -
Mind & Morality
Hosted by Michael Laakasuo
£3.00 35 minutes £5.15/hr 390 places remaining.
It says "Our statistics show that reading a single questionnaire statement and answering it will take about 6-7 seconds." Really!? :mad:0 -
I didn't realise this! I think I'll be contacting the researcher who screened me out of the Paris network study!
And me - got turfed out after the first question.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
And me - got turfed out after the first question.
I've contacted the researcher. She initially said I had not been truthful and wasn't consistent with my Prolific profile. She said I should only have answered that I was familiar with the network if I travelled on it at least weekly, and only people living in France would be that familiar with it. I replied to say that wasn't what her question asked, as being familiar isn't the same as travelling weekly. She said I was the only person to have been rejected at that stage (evidently not true as there is me, you and someone else who said they'd been thrown out, just from this forum).
Anyway I've contacted Prolific support to ask if they can take a look at it. She shouldn't have made assumptions, and her question should have been phrased differently and probably asked as a pre-screening question.0 -
I've contacted the researcher. She initially said I had not been truthful and wasn't consistent with my Prolific profile. She said I should only have answered that I was familiar with the network if I travelled on it at least weekly, and only people living in France would be that familiar with it. I replied to say that wasn't what her question asked, as being familiar isn't the same as travelling weekly. She said I was the only person to have been rejected at that stage (evidently not true as there is me, you and someone else who said they'd been thrown out, just from this forum).
Anyway I've contacted Prolific support to ask if they can take a look at it. She shouldn't have made assumptions, and her question should have been phrased differently and probably asked as a pre-screening question.
Exactly what happened with me - I'm an infrequent user but felt I had some familiarity because of the times I've used it on holiday or passing through. Very unclear on her part. I'll contact prolific tonight.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards