We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Is this legal ?

Darren_Featherstone
Posts: 16 Forumite

Hi all. Would be grateful for views on this scenario please.
A married couple lived together with 2 young children until splitting up. Both work, so no benefits were claimed except for child benefit.
When breaking up, the wife moves into a flat. She claims housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. Comes to around £1300 a month. Husband claims nothing as he works full time. Custody of the girls is 50/50, mum gets child benefit for one girl, dad gets child benefit for the other. So far, so good.
After six months of genuine separation, husband and wife start to see each other again. Nine months later, they are back together, but remain living in separate homes, and the wife continues to receive £1300 a month in housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. The husband continues to work full time so he just gets one child benefit payment, and 25% single person discount on his council tax. The children continue to live with both parents on a 50/50 custody basis. They go away on expensive family holidays and stay over at each others houses most nights.
Is this within the rules or has a line been crossed ? Comments and advice would be appreciated.
A married couple lived together with 2 young children until splitting up. Both work, so no benefits were claimed except for child benefit.
When breaking up, the wife moves into a flat. She claims housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. Comes to around £1300 a month. Husband claims nothing as he works full time. Custody of the girls is 50/50, mum gets child benefit for one girl, dad gets child benefit for the other. So far, so good.
After six months of genuine separation, husband and wife start to see each other again. Nine months later, they are back together, but remain living in separate homes, and the wife continues to receive £1300 a month in housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. The husband continues to work full time so he just gets one child benefit payment, and 25% single person discount on his council tax. The children continue to live with both parents on a 50/50 custody basis. They go away on expensive family holidays and stay over at each others houses most nights.
Is this within the rules or has a line been crossed ? Comments and advice would be appreciated.
0
Comments
-
Darren_Featherstone wrote: »Hi all. Would be grateful for views on this scenario please.
A married couple lived together with 2 young children until splitting up. Both work, so no benefits were claimed except for child benefit.
When breaking up, the wife moves into a flat. She claims housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. Comes to around £1300 a month. Husband claims nothing as he works full time. Custody of the girls is 50/50, mum gets child benefit for one girl, dad gets child benefit for the other. So far, so good.
After six months of genuine separation, husband and wife start to see each other again. Nine months later, they are back together, but remain living in separate homes, and the wife continues to receive £1300 a month in housing benefit, council tax support, working tax credit, and child tax credit. The husband continues to work full time so he just gets one child benefit payment, and 25% single person discount on his council tax. The children continue to live with both parents on a 50/50 custody basis. They go away on expensive family holidays and stay over at each others houses most nights.
Is this within the rules or has a line been crossed ? Comments and advice would be appreciated.
I think you'll find it's called 'benefit fraud'0 -
Thank you. Genuine question - at what point did it become fraud ? The break up was genuine, and the "getting back together" period was on/off/on/off for several months. Presumably on day one of a reconcillation, it is not fraud.0
-
Darren_Featherstone wrote: »Thank you. Genuine question - at what point did it become fraud ? The break up was genuine, and the "getting back together" period was on/off/on/off for several months. Presumably on day one of a reconcillation, it is not fraud.
Of course it was, they were not a new couple testing the waters of a new relationship they’re a married couple rekindling. The minute they took that step and didn’t inform the authorities they committed fraud.0 -
Darren_Featherstone wrote: »Thank you. Genuine question - at what point did it become fraud ? The break up was genuine, and the "getting back together" period was on/off/on/off for several months. Presumably on day one of a reconcillation, it is not fraud.0
-
If they are not living together then they are not a couple.0
-
A line has very clearly been crossed. They're still married and are acting a couple, so they should be considered a couple for Tax Credits and HB.
Definition of a couple ;
(a)a man and a woman who are married to each other and are members of the same household;
(b)a man and a woman who are not married to each other but are living together as husband and wife;
(c)two people of the same sex who are civil partners of each other and are members of the same household; or
(d)two people of the same sex who are not civil partners of each other but are living together as if they were civil partners,
and for the purposes of sub-paragraph (d), two people of the same sex are to be regarded as living together as if they were civil partners if, but only if, they would be regarded as living together as husband and wife were they instead two people of the opposite sex;0 -
For tax credits, there is no requirement for a couple to be living as part of the same household. They can be a couple and living apart.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Definition of a couple ;
(a)a man and a woman who are married to each other and are members of the same household;
(b)a man and a woman who are not married to each other but are living together as husband and wife;
(c)two people of the same sex who are civil partners of each other and are members of the same household; or
(d)two people of the same sex who are not civil partners of each other but are living together as if they were civil partners,
and for the purposes of sub-paragraph (d), two people of the same sex are to be regarded as living together as if they were civil partners if, but only if, they would be regarded as living together as husband and wife were they instead two people of the opposite sex;0 -
The living apart is genuine - when they split, it was meant to be permanent. They genuinely live in separate homes, her flat is her flat genuinely, his home is his home, if that makes sense. As they have got back together, they stay over at each others places.0
-
Some interesting information here that the two people concerned may wish to read.
https://revenuebenefits.org.uk/tax-credits/guidance/how-do-tax-credits-work/understanding-living-together/All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards