We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
TV lost in transit
Comments
-
I returned a Warehouse item last week which had arrived damaged. I'm not a Prime member but got free return via Amazon Lockers.0
-
No reason why it should. The liability for an incident or failure is entirely separate to the issue of whether or not the person was insured against that incident or failure.I also agree with unholyangel, and remember a case on here a couple of years ago where someone got a payout for negligence on a lost item.
You are not asking them to pay out for a broken item. It was broken already, but they have failed to deliver it so have negligently lost it.
On the other hand, the lack of sufficient insurance might (probably will) go against you here. I'm not sure if higher insured items are treated differently to cheap items, but regardless of whether it was an excluded item or not, it was insufficiently insured for its value."MIND IF I USE YOUR PHONE? IF WORD GETS OUT THATI'M MISSING FIVE HUNDRED GIRLS WILL KILL THEMSELVES."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards