We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Britannia parking pcn

sil74
Posts: 30 Forumite
Hi all, thanks in advance for any help you will be kindly providing.
Briefly somebody recently went into a pub car park operated by Britannia and failed to pay for a ticket.
The driver honestly didn't notice the signs or pay machine
Stayed less than 20 minutes 18 to be precise which makes the pcn way out of proportion
I myself have had these in the past, ignored them and gone away but I understood after recent rulings we are under obligation of disclosure of driver name.
The driver would pay a reasonable amount but not the unfair 60 pounds they are asking for.
I have read the newbies forum on pcn and see the standard template for appeal which does not admit who the driver was and is centered on poor signage.
Questions from my side are:
1 is that right we can still choose not to disclose the name of driver when we appeal?
2 how do we find the full terms of the alleged contract?
3 driver would not mind paying a small amount plus some expenses for it, say an offer of 10 pounds would well cover costs. Is this a no no to do in the appeal?
Happy to post a photo of the pcn if it helps and thanks again
Briefly somebody recently went into a pub car park operated by Britannia and failed to pay for a ticket.
The driver honestly didn't notice the signs or pay machine
Stayed less than 20 minutes 18 to be precise which makes the pcn way out of proportion
I myself have had these in the past, ignored them and gone away but I understood after recent rulings we are under obligation of disclosure of driver name.
The driver would pay a reasonable amount but not the unfair 60 pounds they are asking for.
I have read the newbies forum on pcn and see the standard template for appeal which does not admit who the driver was and is centered on poor signage.
Questions from my side are:
1 is that right we can still choose not to disclose the name of driver when we appeal?
2 how do we find the full terms of the alleged contract?
3 driver would not mind paying a small amount plus some expenses for it, say an offer of 10 pounds would well cover costs. Is this a no no to do in the appeal?
Happy to post a photo of the pcn if it helps and thanks again
0
Comments
-
The first post in the NEWBIES FAQ sticky thread tells you exactly how to deal with this.
Just send the blue template appeal.
That's all at this stage. So simple.
Never give away the driver's identity.
That means you need to edit your post to remove all clues to who the driver might have been.
Everything that happened on the day happened to the driver.
Since then the keeper received the PCN.
You should not be using I, myself, or any such words.
For example, your third sentence should start:The driver didn't notice the signs or pay machine...Adjust the rest of your post similarly.0 -
Keith thanks for your reply and suggestion I have edited accordingly
Is this the txt I should be using?
Dear Sirs
Re: PCN No. ....................
I challenge this 'PCN' as keeper of the car.
I believe that your signs fail the test of 'large lettering' and prominence, as established in ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis. Your unremarkable and obscure signs were not seen by the driver, are in very small print and the terms are not readable to drivers.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. You must either rely on the POFA 2012 and offer me a POPLA code, or cancel the charge.
Should you obtain the registered keeper's data from the DVLA without reasonable cause, please take this as formal notice that I reserve the right to sue your company and the landowner/principal, for a sum not less than £250 for any Data Protection Act breach. Your aggressive business practice and unwarranted threat of court for the ordinary matter of a driver using my car without causing any obstruction nor offence, has caused significant distress to me.
I do not give you consent to process data relating to me or this vehicle. I deny liability for any sum at all and you must consider this letter a Section 10 Notice under the DPA. You are required to respond within 21 days. I have kept proof of submission of this appeal and look forward to your reply.0 -
How many blue template appeals did you find?0
-
Fair point better sure than sorry ;-)0
-
Have you seen how busy this forum is - often with threads requiring things repeated that are set out in the FAQ.
There is no need to seek reassurance if you are following the FAQ - it's bang up to date0 -
Without being unwelcoming to people who really need help (and this easy stage is not it) we need to stop threads asking us to repeat what's in the NEWBIES thread. We can't have this, or the forum will drown.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
My appeal was rejected as expected and received a POPLA appeal code from Britannia. Is it ok for me to post here a draft version of the appeal once I put it together?
Also I noticed reading a few examples in the forum that most are based on the following: The Notice to Keeper does not comply with sub-paragraph 9 (2)(f) POFA 2012, as far as I can see and understand mine was compliant so will have to omit this bit unless any of you has specific experience with POPLA appeals Vs Britannia which would be greatly appreciated.0 -
Are you the original poster? If so it would be prudent to explain why you have a different but similar username instead of using the original one you signed up with.
If you are the same poster and can't remember your original login details, you should contact a Board Guide to get it changed.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
My appeal was rejected as expected and received a POPLA appeal code from Britannia. Is it ok for me to post here a draft version of the appeal once I put it together?
Also I noticed reading a few examples in the forum that most are based on the following: The Notice to Keeper does not comply with sub-paragraph 9 (2)(f) POFA 2012, as far as I can see and understand mine was compliant so will have to omit this bit unless any of you has specific experience with POPLA appeals Vs Britannia which would be greatly appreciated.
Please start your own thread for advice. It gets really confusing answering several people in one thread.0 -
Unless you are the same poster?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards