We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can the same solicitor act for buyer and seller?
Options
Comments
-
Unlikely there is a contract the contract will be written for the Son or the Mother the other will need to get independant legal advice. If the firm is large and has two solicitors to deal with this then you may be able to use the same firm but not the same solicitor otherwise there will be a conflict of interest.
Solicitors do sometimes act where there is a conflict of interest. A good example is that the same solicitor will usually act for both the mortgage lender and the purchaser in a conveyancing transaction. It can be done so long as both parties consent and the matter is unlikely to be contentious.
I would have thought it should be OK in the situation described by the Op, as the solicitor is really just documenting straightforward agreed terms.
The SRA rules state that solicitors may act where there is a conflict of interest if the following conditions are met:
"where there is a client conflict and the clients have a substantially common interest in relation to a matter or a particular aspect of it, you only act if:
(a) you have explained the relevant issues and risks to the clients and you have a reasonable belief that they understand those issues and risks;
(b) all the clients have given informed consent in writing to you acting;
(c) you are satisfied that it is reasonable for you to act for all the clients and that it is in their best interests; and
(d) you are satisfied that the benefits to the clients of you doing so outweigh the risks".0 -
Is there a mortgage involved? Either a current one in your name, or a new one in son's name?
If not, why use a solicitor at all?
Though you might use one not for the title transfer but either
a) to draw up a Deed specifying the payments, penalties for arrears, etc and/or
b) to place a personal Charge (mortgage) on the property.0 -
steampowered wrote: »I would have thought it should be OK in the situation described by the Op, as the solicitor is really just documenting straightforward agreed terms.
So the best legal advice will be different depending on whether solicitor is acting for parent or son. Might be easier if they agree between them exactly what they want before going to solicitor.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards