We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

car/motorbike accident

1235»

Comments

  • Kiran
    Kiran Posts: 1,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 October 2017 at 7:39AM
    For what it's worth, saying you couldn't brake would probably show lake of care or attention. Saying you weren't able to stop in time would more likely suggest that you were pulled out on. Given the impact was to the rear of the car that pulled out on you it would have been visible for a few seconds if you see what I mean. Insurance companies don't like paying out so don't give them any ammunition to use against you.

    I've not been riding that many years but its true what they teach , everybody is out to get you!
    Some people don't exaggerate........... They just remember big!
  • yes thats correct.
  • op's been perfectly clear imo. No idea why you think there would only be traffic to the cars right. Traffic is generally slow moving/stationary because there is something in front of them impeding their journey.

    Op was on left side of road through, there was heavy traffic in the oncoming lane to their right. To the right of that oncoming traffic, there was a car waiting to turn right (to go into same lane in same direction op was going). Car waiting to emerge has probably either been flashed by one of the cars in the oncoming traffic and assumed it was safe so pulled out without properly checking or they've spotted a gap in the traffic coming from their right and were fed up waiting so haven't properly checked before pulling out in front of op.

    As others have said though, if the car driver is alleging they saw op - especially long enough for them to accurately judge that they were driving in excess of the speed limit, they're also admitting that either :
    1) they made the decision to pull out in front of him after assessing his speed and deeming it to be too fast
    2) they didn't assess his speed at all before pulling out and by the time they realised, it was too late.

    Either of those would be dangerous and would fall below the standard of a reasonably competent driver. In addition, they both go some way to showing that the other drivers judgement is lacking and therefore his judgement of what speed op was doing cannot be relied upon.

    yes this is perfectly correct thank you. I don't understand why they don't get it. Thanks a lot for understanding.

    And to the person who said about the poor english. I left school when i was 12 so i didn't get any gcse's but mock me all you want i don't care.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.