We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Brexit, the economy and house prices part 5
Comments
-
Honey_Badger wrote: »I'm not sure this story holds water, as I understand it:
1) The concerns revolve around delays and paper work due customs clearance as aviation products are tariff free. As another poster said China isn't in the EU so that doesn't seem to make sense.
2) I cannot see that a much longer journey from China makes any sense at all, if you are concerned about delivery times. Especially given 3. below.
I assume they are built in both the UK and China at the moment. If it becomes harder / more expensive to ship from UK->EU, and China gets a FTA with the EU, it may make sense to shift more production from UK to China.0 -
Wage bills that the U.K. will no longer need to part fund I’m assuming and the financial ‘loss’ of two such agencies will be offset by us having to do the job ourselves
Wage bills that are no longer part paid by the UK, but now no longer feed back into the UK economy via income tax, council tax, VAT, capital gains tax, and so on. That £75m in wages could easily represent £25-30m in income tax alone.
Plus, we don't know if we'll actually save our share in the cost of these agencies, because it's likely the UK equivalents will cost more than our share due to the loss of economies of scale. We're also going to have to spend money travelling back and forth to their offices to interact with them on a regular basis, spending even more money in the local economies.0 -
Plus, we don't know if we'll actually save our share in the cost of these agencies, because it's likely the UK equivalents will cost more than our share due to the loss of economies of scale. We're also going to have to spend money travelling back and forth to their offices to interact with them on a regular basis, spending even more money in the local economies.
Having a Quango to put in regulations in is fine, but these then need to be enforced, and that didn't seem to happen in the case of the PIP implants, the J+J metal on metal hip replacement etc.
Arguably these days the regulation needs to be global, not country or even continent wide, so the opportunity should be there after Brexit to create a system that can help companies understand their obligations for all medcal drugs and appliances in every area of the world they wish to market into, rather than having to look things up individually for each product type / administration.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Old news. Time to change the record.
Now why would remoaners do that. Lies of this magnitude will echo down through history for decades to come.
Just to remind you.
Members of today's cabinet said £18 billion was sent to the EU and that money could be given to the NHS.
The big red bus will not drive away into the distance. It is the Albatross hanging round the neck of the quittlings.There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.0 -
So how have medical companies coped with selling into the US, who require FDA regulations to be satisfied for medicines / medical devices, rather than EU rules?
Having a Quango to put in regulations in is fine, but these then need to be enforced, and that didn't seem to happen in the case of the PIP implants, the J+J metal on metal hip replacement etc.
Arguably these days the regulation needs to be global, not country or even continent wide, so the opportunity should be there after Brexit to create a system that can help companies understand their obligations for all medcal drugs and appliances in every area of the world they wish to market into, rather than having to look things up individually for each product type / administration.
Interesting thoughts.
I didn't know Brexit was also about reinventing the wheel. Britain will need to focus on its needs if it is to make any success out of the Brexit Crisis.There will be no Brexit dividend for Britain.0 -
So how have medical companies coped with selling into the US, who require FDA regulations to be satisfied for medicines / medical devices, rather than EU rules?
Having a Quango to put in regulations in is fine, but these then need to be enforced, and that didn't seem to happen in the case of the PIP implants, the J+J metal on metal hip replacement etc.
Arguably these days the regulation needs to be global, not country or even continent wide, so the opportunity should be there after Brexit to create a system that can help companies understand their obligations for all medcal drugs and appliances in every area of the world they wish to market into, rather than having to look things up individually for each product type / administration.
I don't entirely follow. I don't think anyone said the UK won't cope by having a different agency for medical standards. Just that the UK having it's own agency which replicates EU work and regulations won't save the UK any money, before factoring in the economic loss of moving an agency away.
So now we'll have to deal with the our local agency, the FDA and the EMA.
Maybe we should be pushing to globalize it; that'd yield the biggest benefits.0 -
I don't entirely follow. I don't think anyone said the UK won't cope by having a different agency for medical standards. Just that the UK having it's own agency which replicates EU work and regulations won't save the UK any money, before factoring in the economic loss of moving an agency away.
So now we'll have to deal with the our local agency, the FDA and the EMA.
Maybe we should be pushing to globalize it; that'd yield the biggest benefits.
The Yanks would never go for that, unless the "global" standards were the FDA standards, and unfortunately the FDA have already shown themselves to be untrustworthy and unscientific.........Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards