We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Housing market move given Brexit and interest rise
Comments
-
Decreasing house prices is not a good thing as negative equity can have serious implications on families. What is needed is a stagnation in increase and allow wages to catch up.
House prices have done just that in Scotland / Wales / Norther-Ireland / NE-England / NW-England / Yorkshire&Humber and a lot of the E&W Midlands too. Those areas are now very affordable so much so that a repayment mortgage on a 3 bedroom starter terrace is close to or lower than social rents0 -
Decreasing house prices is not a good thing as negative equity can have serious implications on families. What is needed is a stagnation in increase and allow wages to catch up.
Most households with repayment mortgages can stomach decreasing prices though. As long as the decrease is less than the capital repayment portion of the mortgage then their equity in a property will actually increase. 1-2% nominal falls shouldn't put anyone into negative equity.0 -
House prices have done just that in Scotland / Wales / Norther-Ireland / NE-England / NW-England / Yorkshire&Humber and a lot of the E&W Midlands too. Those areas are now very affordable so much so that a repayment mortgage on a 3 bedroom starter terrace is close to or lower than social rents
http://www.mortgagesolutions.co.uk/news/2017/10/12/housing-bubble-alert-issued-mortgage-adviser-19-uk-towns-cities/0 -
chucknorris wrote: »You are correct about that 1% GreatApe, we are looking to upsize our home and we currently have about £1.3m sitting in savings accounts earning about 1% (1.17% in my case in a Sainsburys bank savings account), I feel like I'm being mugged.
you are. inflation is currently sitting just below 3% so your savings are actually being eroded.0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »
Yet more wisdom from HPC's answer to Warren Buffet
This eminent wisdom comes from a 50-something man who lives alone in a bedsit in Edinburgh, having sold up in the late 90s – just before a 20 year property bull run.
He missed the buying opportunity of a lifetime in 2008-09 and seems to be just a little bitter.0 -
equity is just vanity, unless you are trying to release it.
when times are hard all people care about is can they keep hold of their houses, any price correction is irrelevant, yes it stagnates the market and might put people into negative equity, but what really matters is can people afford their mortgage, and at the last correction yes employment levels were high and interest rates low so people managed.
The 80/90s crash was different there was a hike in interest rates to try to hold the value of the pound against the deutsch mark to keep us competitive in Europe ahead of entry into the ERM and this in addition to high unemployment meant that the bubble burst.
But the overall trend has been upwards.
I know of people who just surrendered their keys in those days, who now own several houses outright or with minimal mortgages.
The market will recover and provided you are sensible with your gearing, you should be OK0 -
equity is just vanity, unless you are trying to release it.
when times are hard all people care about is can they keep hold of their houses, any price correction is irrelevant, yes it stagnates the market and might put people into negative equity, but what really matters is can people afford their mortgage, and at the last correction yes employment levels were high and interest rates low so people managed.
The 80/90s crash was different there was a hike in interest rates to try to hold the value of the pound against the deutsch mark to keep us competitive in Europe ahead of entry into the ERM and this in addition to high unemployment meant that the bubble burst.
But the overall trend has been upwards.
I know of people who just surrendered their keys in those days, who now own several houses outright or with minimal mortgages.
The market will recover and provided you are sensible with your gearing, you should be OK
Nah, the debt burden on average people is miles different to what it was back then, small interest rate changes will affect things big time. The Tories are doing their best to hand the next election to JC, and he will quickly get us into troubled waters with international markets IMO.0 -
I agree prices are to high in some areas, but I don't agree that it is entirely down to government intervention to prop up housing market otherwise property would have boomed everywhere. Most of the measure taken were to protect economy not prop up housing market. What is need is more property in areas where it is needed the most or somehow to spread demand more evenly around the country.
It's not totally down to govenment intervention but makes a large part of it. You have the whole foriegn investors issue which was focussed on certain areas of the country and not others, however in the areas where they invested heavily it caused ripples outwards,
Govenment policy destroyed savings too which lead to lots of money being taken out and put into property instead. There are massive consequences when you attack free markets and result in asset bubbles such as housing.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
What makes you say that since 2007 affordability criteria has been tightened so people are less likely to default.Crashy_Time wrote: »Nah, the debt burden on average people is miles different to what it was back then, small interest rate changes will affect things big time. The Tories are doing their best to hand the next election to JC, and he will quickly get us into troubled waters with international markets IMO.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards