We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
NCP PCN - appeal denied going 1 minute over stay due to injured child
Themadcow
Posts: 17 Forumite
Hi all,
My wife was recently issued a PCN for going 1 minute over stay (exit time 11:45, time on ticket 11:44) in an NCP car park.
I maybe hastily appealed this, citing that the reason for the delayed exit was that my child had broken their leg, and that my wife needed to spend longer than anticipated transferring them from wheelchair into the car. The NCP car park is opposite a hospital fracture clinic, and I have evidence of the injury.
Despite this, NCP turned down my appeal citing breach of contract and said "they have considered the comments you have made" but did not directly mention the mitigating circumstances of my child's broken leg.
Does anyone know what steps I should take next? Obviously they are going with the blackmail approach that I can appeal to POPLA but if unsuccessful I will be liable for £100 rather than £60, which is pretty disgusting.
Any knowledgeable advice would be welcome!
Thanks,
My wife was recently issued a PCN for going 1 minute over stay (exit time 11:45, time on ticket 11:44) in an NCP car park.
I maybe hastily appealed this, citing that the reason for the delayed exit was that my child had broken their leg, and that my wife needed to spend longer than anticipated transferring them from wheelchair into the car. The NCP car park is opposite a hospital fracture clinic, and I have evidence of the injury.
Despite this, NCP turned down my appeal citing breach of contract and said "they have considered the comments you have made" but did not directly mention the mitigating circumstances of my child's broken leg.
Does anyone know what steps I should take next? Obviously they are going with the blackmail approach that I can appeal to POPLA but if unsuccessful I will be liable for £100 rather than £60, which is pretty disgusting.
Any knowledgeable advice would be welcome!
Thanks,
0
Comments
-
ask them to explain why they have not allowed a grace period , not less than 10 mins as per BPA code of practiceSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Win at POPLA, like we pretty much always do against NCP.Does anyone know what steps I should take next?
I disagree.My wife was recently issued a PCN for going 1 minute over stay (exit time 11:45, time on ticket 11:44) in an NCP car park.
The PCN cannot possibly have been for a 1 minute overstay. NCP would never have issued it for that.
It will be for something else, maybe if the wrong VRN was input when paying? Did you send a copy of the PDT ticket with the appeal, and has it got the right VRN on it?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Heya - originally the PCN was for failure to obtain a valid parking ticket, but this was incorrect as the machine was failing to accept the REG number of the car. We produced the pay and display ticket and sent it with the clear expiry of 11:44 compared to the photographic exit time of 11:45 and the explanation. They accepted the ticket was valid, but said that we'd breached contract regardless.
From what I'm reading above, it's worth taking further as a PCN for 1 minute overstay is highly irregular - irrespective of mitigating circumstances?0 -
Have you contacted the local paper, they love this sort of story, and the PPC will look bad.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Heya - originally the PCN was for failure to obtain a valid parking ticket, but this was incorrect as the machine was failing to accept the REG number of the car. We produced the pay and display ticket and sent it with the clear expiry of 11:44 compared to the photographic exit time of 11:45 and the explanation. They accepted the ticket was valid, but said that we'd breached contract regardless.
From what I'm reading above, it's worth taking further as a PCN for 1 minute overstay is highly irregular - irrespective of mitigating circumstances?
No you are not getting this, you do not have a pcn for going over by one minute, you have it as they say you never paid at all, as there is no record of your car registration number in their silly computer system.
They are saying the ticket never had your vrn on it so it was invalid!
This is a common problem with these systems and the PPC's love it as they hide behind terms and conditions even though you paid, and it's their system that is the problem.
You are quite right about "the blackmail approach" that is exactly what it is, don't fall for it.
You need to take it to POPLA but don't use any mitigation or talk of broken legs etc it won't make any difference, only technicalities work with them.
Unlikely to ever get in front of a judge but I would bet he would laugh it out of court.0 -
I do get it
In their appeal response, they recognise the validity of the ticket I provided, but stipulate that because the ticket expired before departure we are still in breach of contract.
So basically:
1) PCN issued because they didn't believe we had a parking ticket
2) Appeal lodged providing parking ticket (1 min expired)
3) NCP dismiss the appeal, citing that "Whilst I appreciate that you had made payment for parking on the day of contravention, the payment had expired prior to your exit of the car park" also stating that because the notice had been issued "correctly" it can not be cancelled
They do acknowledge it was a valid ticket, but are trying to fine me for 1 minute overdue regardless.0 -
Can you post up a copy of the exact wording of their reply please? (Redact any personal details). In full. (Just in case you are mis-reading and have quoted a part of their reply out of context).
We don't disbelieve you - we want to be sure you have the strongest possible base from which to defend this.
0 -
Thanks - here is the PCN...

and the appeal rejection...
They have exit photographed at 11:45:37, and ticket shows 11:44 expiry.0 -
I’d cause them major inconvenience via both complaint and POPLA appeal
1. Complain to the BPA (and, importantly, copy to David Dunford of the DVLA) that NCP can’t seem to make up their minds as to exactly for what and why they are trying to impose this charge on you. As NCP state that you have come to the end of their appeals process and you are none the wiser as to the reason for the charge, you are turning to the BPA to resolve, as you need to know exactly what it is you are appealing against.
Copy all documentation you’ve written/received to the BPA and DVLA.
Complaints to the BPA and DVLA can be emailed to:
aos@britishparking.co.uk
steve.c@britishparking.co.uk
or (if posting)
British Parking Association
Stuart House
41-43 Perrymount Road
Haywards Heath
West Sussex
RH16 3BN
and DVLA:
FOI@dvla.gsi.gov.uk
david.dunford@dvla.gsi.gov.uk
2. Prepare for drafting your POPLA appeal by studying the NEWBIES FAQ sticky, post #3 where there are also template appeal paragraphs covering the major winning appeal points. You can do the bulk of the drafting as there’s stuff like ‘Landowner Authority’, ‘Signage’, ‘No Keeper Liability’ (depending on what you said in your initial appeal) and ‘Grace Periods’ which are all pretty generic and apply to most parking charges.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Great, thanks! Will let the board know how I get on...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

