Appeal dismissed by IAS

Snakes_Belly

The person that I spoke to said the car park must form part of the Travelodge as it is not listed separately.

nosferatu1001

Which you didnt say above.
So theyre the occupioer and are the only one that could have hired the PPC...

Snakes_Belly

Sorry, if I confused the issue.

The Travelodge are the occupier however they are not the original business that hired Excel. They trade under the name like a franchise. I have asked Excel for documents showing that they have the authority to pursue claims through the courts but nothing has been forthcoming and it has been over eight weeks now since my letter of the 7th June 2018.

Snakes_Belly

Update.

I sent my rebuttal letter to the PCC on the 7/6/2018 within the timeframe. I requested information which they are required to supply within 30 days. No reply so I sent a second letter. Reply came dated 9/8/2018 which states that they are disappointed that we have not reached an amicable agreement in respect of their LBC and are giving me 14 days notice of their intentions to start court proceedings. None of the requested information has been provided including the authority from the landowner.

I am not sure whether to just let them do their worst or whether to write back and make a third request for the information. I understand that if my request is not met I can stay any court action until it is provided. Not sure how I would go about this and whether it is worth doing. I have asked them twice for this information and if they have not got the authority from the landowner they will be wasting court time. This has been dragging on for over twelve months.

I would stay any court action if it is a straightforward process and would not result in the possibility of missing a court deadline. I would like to see if they do come up with authority from the landowner.

If they do pursue the claim through the courts it's most important that I stay focused on the main issues and defend my case in person and not by papers.

I am finding it very hard now to remain polite to these people, which is why I am not using email.

BTW I have been in touch with my MP.


Thank you.

beamerguy

It is a shame that Excel think they are above the law.
A judge will bring them crashing down to earth for
non compliance of the new protocol.
Excel are used to being whooped in court and the
courts are also aware of their method of business, especially
wasting the courts time.

A final letter from you warning them if they do not
comply with the law and continue to refuse to provide
the information required, you will advise the court and
ask for the case to be struck off

As we know, Excel read this forum so no doubt such
information will be read before they receive your letter

Sooner or later one of these so called bright boys
will have their collar felt by the courts for failure to
comply with the new protocol and my guess, the first
one will be Excel

Snakes_Belly

Thank you Beamer. I was thinking along those lines of doing a final letter but that will be my last dialogue with them before they instigate court proceedings.

beamerguy

Snakes_Belly wrote: »

Thank you Beamer. I was thinking along those lines of doing a final letter but that will be my last dialogue with them before they instigate court proceedings.

If EXCEL cannot behave themselves, let the court whoop them,
EXCEL are used to that now anyway

Snakes_Belly

You know the employees have to pay for parking on the business park. I wonder if they get ticketed? Most of them seem to be on a basic minimum wage the rest being made up by bonus. Says it all really. Once you start bringing in bonus schemes for meeting and exceeding targets you are asking for trouble in this kind of scenario. A number of complaints from employees about equipment and service vehicles breaking down.

BTW they seem to be dealing with their own litigation now. I have not received anything from a 'low rent' solicitor so perhaps they are distancing themselves after the comments in Parliament about certain solicitors.

Umkomaas

BTW they seem to be dealing with their own litigation now. I have not received anything from a 'low rent' solicitor so perhaps they are distancing themselves after the comments in Parliament about certain solicitors.

Maybe BW Legal have messed up too many cases, costing them a lot of money? Who knows!

Quentin

Snakes_Belly wrote: »

You know the employees have to pay for parking on the business park. I wonder if they get ticketed? Most of them seem to be on a basic minimum wage the rest being made up by bonus. Says it all really. Once you start bringing in bonus schemes for meeting and exceeding targets you are asking for trouble in this kind of scenario. A number of complaints from employees about equipment and service vehicles breaking down.

BTW they seem to be dealing with their own litigation now. I have not received anything from a 'low rent' solicitor so perhaps they are distancing themselves after the comments in Parliament about certain solicitors.

Not unusual for employees to have to pay for parking at work


Google the nurses parking charges at cardiff for a horrendous example