We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Are you a woman over 60 who doesn’t get a state pension? Get £1000s back

Options
14567810»

Comments

  • stagey_2
    stagey_2 Posts: 201 Forumite
    Hi - I just read the first entry by Martin (from 2007) about if as a woman you've just paid NI under the 10yrs for a full pension etc - I paid the married woman's stamp until 1994, divorced and then remairried, so had to then pay the 'full stamp'. I've worked full time ever since (as I was before anyway) so that's approx 14 years and the government pension that I get is only £66 ish - how come if you've paid just under the 10 years but make it up - you might then get £80 + (I think that is what it said) why should I only get £66 - that does seem unfair. Anyone out there can tell me why?? thanks PS I should say that I am 63 and still working - cos I can't afford not too!!
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    stagey wrote: »
    I've worked full time ever since (as I was before anyway) so that's approx 14 years and the government pension that I get is only £66 ish - how come if you've paid just under the 10 years but make it up - you might then get £80 +

    Unfortunately you can only pay up back years from now - a total of nine back to 1999. But you've already paid these years, so the option is not open to you. Compounding the problem is that you paid the MW stamp so wouldn't be eligible for home responsibilities protection if looking after children, which gets you NI years credited.

    I agree the old rules were very arbitrary as if designed deliberatly to make it virtually impossible for a women to claim a state pension - except on her husbands record of course.

    That's they way they thought in those days..
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    I agree the old rules were very arbitrary as if designed deliberatly to make it virtually impossible for a women to claim a state pension - except on her husbands record of course.

    That's they way they thought in those days..

    That's exactly it.

    Remember, Beveridge in his 1942 report said 'she has other duties' which he then went on to specify: 'replenish the population'.

    This was challenged at the time by a minority report by 2 women, Abbott and Bompas, but their view was ignored when the legislation was drawn up by the post-war Labour government. See: http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=189876
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.