Gladstones / Millennium claim form

Lamilad

I'd have just gone with Johersh's words and almost nothing else except this as an intro:

+1 and double check spelling before you send......

wi3347

Why I think its relevant to briefly mention the LR search is because the vehicle was parked on Salubrious Passage which is public land and not on land covered by the boundary of Metropole chambers. Its quite pivotal to this argument that i demonstrate the car was on public land and not land which comes under their boundary

KeithP

wi3347 wrote: »

Why I think its relevant to briefly mention the LR search is because the vehicle was parked on Salubrious Passage which is public land and not on land covered by the boundary of Metropole chambers. Its quite pivotal to this argument that i demonstrate the car was on public land and not land which comes under their boundary

And Swansea council's Highway Dept confirms this.

I too would go with C-M's suggestion.

The Land Registry stuff adds nothing.

wi3347

KeithP wrote: »

And Swansea council's Highway Dept confirms this.

I too would go with C-M's suggestion.

The Land Registry stuff adds nothing.

The email from the highways department confirmed that Salubrious passage is an adopted highway and it maintained by the city and county of Swansea. It doesn't demonstrate that my vehicle was parked there. The NTK i got through the post states the vehicle was parked at "Metropole Chambers" which millennium may well have authority to enforce parking on. I think be making it clean the car was parked on Salubrious Passage and not parked in an area covered by the boundary of Metropole chambers it makes it clear it was on public land. Doesn't leave it open for debate

KeithP

wi3347 wrote: »

The email from the highways department confirmed that Salubrious passage is an adopted highway and it maintained by the city and county of Swansea. It doesn't demonstrate that my vehicle was parked there. The NTK i got through the post states the vehicle was parked at "Metropole Chambers" which millennium may well have authority to enforce parking on. I think be making it clean the car was parked on Salubrious Passage and not parked in an area covered by the boundary of Metropole chambers it makes it clear it was on public land. Doesn't leave it open for debate

You told us the LR confirms:

It clearly shows the boundary line for Metropole chambers is the building alone and not the land outside.

If the car was parked outside the building, it couldn't have been in Metropole Chambers, could it?

Anyway, it is no-one on this forum you need to convince.

softwaremad

Loving the salubrious. Gossip in from last night that this is a method used with millennium to get tickets cancelled down that way.

Coupon-mad

softwaremad wrote: »

Loving the salubrious. Gossip in from last night that this is a method used with millennium to get tickets cancelled down that way.

:cool:

No, no and more no...! That's almost on a par with Levi Bellfield's alleged *offers* to remove clamps, back in the day.

:eek:

wi3347

I think we are getting confused a bit now. They are saying The car was parked on land covered by metropole chambers. My point is The car was parked on salubrious passage, public land. If I just say"salubrious passage is public land" well that makes no difference unless I'm making it clear I was parked there and not at metropole chambers.

Received the copy of the directions questions today. Gladstones have requested not to have a hearing and do it all on paper. Seems to be their thing lately.

Coupon-mad

Gladstones have used that tactic for ages, very misleading for the unwary.

wi3347

still not received my directions questions or anyting else from the court as yet which seems odd?