We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Defence mitigating circumstances
Comments
-
Post now deletedStaceyplindfield wrote: »Have removed link but unable to edit your post0 -
You may wish to point out that the witness claims, (paragraph 15), that the signs have been audited by the IPC; but they, (the IPC), have somehow managed to miss the fact that the sign shows UK Car Park Management as being members of the BPA. (More likely, no such audit has ever been carried out, as the sign also state that you have to have a tax disc on display!).Staceyplindfield wrote: »No they did not originally send me this photo, I received only when ws arrived last week, however the sign is not on the route I took or near where parked but further down the estate!0 -
Anything I can go back with regards to contract? (2014?)0
-
So the sign isn’t on the route, but ukpc state it was?
That’s something to point out. An operator known for altering photos and submitting false evidence to popla doing it again? Shock.0 -
Tax disc ended in October 2014, so a very old sign! How often do they audit? Unsure why in there witness statement ipc is mentioned thought they were bpa? Probably getting confused again! Attempting a skeleton but just can't get head round it0
-
1.1 The IPC will monitor developments within the sector and make such changes to the Code as appear necessary in response to any changes in legisla on or otherwise. The IPC values the views of consumer groups, operators, landowners and all those a ected by its terms. The Code is a living document and feedback provided by interested par es will be considered whenever it is reviewed.
Ipc does this help me due to out of date signage? However this was not mentioned in defence/ws?0 -
If it was claimed in their WS that the signs were audited, but they have not evidenced that supposed audit, you can CERTAINLY challenge this at the hearing even if it wasn't in your WS. Make yourself some notes about their WS and evidence, that you want to challenge, so you don't forget once in a court room with a Judge.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
https://ibb.co/fa2Cwb Anything I can go back with regards to contract such as dated 2014?0
-
That's not the full contract because it has to be read in conjunction with the "service proposal", (which appears to be missing).Staceyplindfield wrote: »https://ibb.co/fa2Cwb Anything I can go back with regards to contract such as dated 2014?
Furthermore, the authorisation form only allows UK CPM to provide enforcement; it doesn't allow UKCPM to offer parking and more importantly, doesn't allow UKCPM to issue court proceedings in its own name. (Which is a requirement of the IPC's Code of Practice).0 -
Excellent thank you kindly much appreciated0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards