We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stamp duty fees hack!

2

Comments

  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think this hack supersedes the OP's ideas about how to appear to be a resident landlord when you really live elsewhere.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    To be fair, there's no need to physically divide the property, it could be two purchases each of a 50% interest in the house. It's the fact the transactions are obviously linked which is the problem.
  • Mossfarr
    Mossfarr Posts: 530 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    Even if you could get around the planning, building regs etc etc If you were buying two properties then surely one of them would actually incur the extra 3% stamp duty as a second home
  • aneary
    aneary Posts: 921 Forumite
    Council tax as well.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Mossfarr wrote: »
    Even if you could get around the planning, building regs etc etc If you were buying two properties then surely one of them would actually incur the extra 3% stamp duty as a second home

    Which would work out as £12,500 in total, so actually only a £2,500 saving even if all the other issues could be worked out (which they couldn't).

    OP, for the complete avoidance of doubt, this is from the HMRC website:
    When 2 or more property transactions involve the same buyer and seller, they count as ‘linked’ for SDLT. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) may count people connected to a buyer or seller as being the same buyer or seller.

    If 2 or more transactions are treated as linked then the buyer pays any SDLT due on the total value of all linked transactions. This may mean that they pay a higher rate of SDLT than if the transactions are counted individually.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Zizou
    Zizou Posts: 17 Forumite
    You can put one under your name and other under your partner or next of kin
  • Annie35
    Annie35 Posts: 385 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    too much like hard work, now all you have to really do is value the house at 249999 & have the contents valued at 249999 & bobs your uncle! :T:T
  • Herbalus
    Herbalus Posts: 2,634 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    While you're at it, why don't you agree with the seller that you'll pay £10 for the house, and oh look that's £499,990 as a birthday present.
  • ReadingTim
    ReadingTim Posts: 4,087 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Errr...less of a saving than you think because you're buying 2 properties rather than one, so liable for the additional 3% SDLT. Property number 2 costs £10k rather than £2.5k, saving you a grand total of £2.5k in total, not £10k. Even if it didn't fail for all of the other reasons everyone else has outlined.

    Still, a cunning plan, worthy of Baldrick himself......
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 3 August 2017 at 5:08PM
    This is an excellent idea. Save SDLT.

    As was your idea of getting Consent for Lodgers instead of Consent to Let from your lender - just need a letter or two delivered to the house.
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/72918519#Comment_72918519

    And your idea of selling a house via gumtree. Save estate agent fees.
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/72918553#Comment_72918553


    Keep them coming.....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.