We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Buying Second house to live in - Stamp Duty

jackouk1234
Posts: 7 Forumite
Hi There,
Short story is (and I’ve read other threads but mostly they are people wanting to do dodgy accounting to get around it) any way to legally avoid the 3% stamp duty if you buy a second home to move into and rent your original property out?
Long story:
I've owned a house worth £90k for 3 years, and exclusively lived in it. I'm now earning enough to upgrade to a bigger house (around the £200k mark). I have enough savings to put down the deposit and the charges etc (even the extra 3% stamp duty for second homes). I owe about £70k on my present house. My plan is to rent out my current house.
Issue I have is with the second home 3% stamp duty. I can understand if I was some serious property tycoon but I'm not, and I am moving my home, not purchasing a new house as a buy to let. I wouldn't hesitate to pay the extra 3% on the £90k property but I am reluctant to accept paying the 3% on the new £200k house, and being penalised as though the £200k house is a buy to let. I'm self-employed so I don't pay into a pension hence the thought to keep it as a pension, not as a general investment.
I don't believe there is any option but to stump up the extra 3% and either live with it or sell the £90k house within 3 years. Alternatively sell the 90k house, claim the 3% on the £200k house back, then buy another £90k house as a buy to let.
But are there alternatives? Am I not missing something, such as an exception if you are moving your residence? Would selling the £90k house to, say, a friend and then buying it back be above board? I also run a limited company and have thought about having the ltd company buy the house from me but I can't see that being financially beneficial.
Another reason why I don't want to sell the £90k property is because 1) it would take me DAYS to move, no matter how much packing I do beforehand 2) it needs redecorating and it's nearly impossible while I'm living there as I've massively outgrown it 3) I want to buy before the end of the summer and 4) I think I could get a better deal not being in a chain.
Thanks!
Short story is (and I’ve read other threads but mostly they are people wanting to do dodgy accounting to get around it) any way to legally avoid the 3% stamp duty if you buy a second home to move into and rent your original property out?
Long story:
I've owned a house worth £90k for 3 years, and exclusively lived in it. I'm now earning enough to upgrade to a bigger house (around the £200k mark). I have enough savings to put down the deposit and the charges etc (even the extra 3% stamp duty for second homes). I owe about £70k on my present house. My plan is to rent out my current house.
Issue I have is with the second home 3% stamp duty. I can understand if I was some serious property tycoon but I'm not, and I am moving my home, not purchasing a new house as a buy to let. I wouldn't hesitate to pay the extra 3% on the £90k property but I am reluctant to accept paying the 3% on the new £200k house, and being penalised as though the £200k house is a buy to let. I'm self-employed so I don't pay into a pension hence the thought to keep it as a pension, not as a general investment.
I don't believe there is any option but to stump up the extra 3% and either live with it or sell the £90k house within 3 years. Alternatively sell the 90k house, claim the 3% on the £200k house back, then buy another £90k house as a buy to let.
But are there alternatives? Am I not missing something, such as an exception if you are moving your residence? Would selling the £90k house to, say, a friend and then buying it back be above board? I also run a limited company and have thought about having the ltd company buy the house from me but I can't see that being financially beneficial.
Another reason why I don't want to sell the £90k property is because 1) it would take me DAYS to move, no matter how much packing I do beforehand 2) it needs redecorating and it's nearly impossible while I'm living there as I've massively outgrown it 3) I want to buy before the end of the summer and 4) I think I could get a better deal not being in a chain.
Thanks!
0
Comments
-
Do you really want the hassle of being a landlord?0
-
There is no way around it. Your options are:
1) Sell the £90k house at the same time as buying the £200k house so you don't end the day owning more than one property;
2) Pay the extra stamp duty on the £200k house, then sell the £90k house within 3 years of buying the £200k house to claim back to extra SDLT you've paid on the purchase of the £200k house;
3) Pay the extra stamp duty on the £200k house and keep both properties.0 -
You ar buying a 2nd property and becoming a landlord.
Is that not exactly the catagory of person the additional SDLT law was aimed at discouragng, and raising tax revenue from?
The way around this is to obtain the passport of a deceased child born some 21+ years ago and buy the 2nd property in that person's name.
Just like any other fraudster.0 -
I'm self-employed so I don't pay into a pension
The one doesn't follow from the other.
Time to look into starting a pension.
http://www.kirkrice.co.uk/blog/company-director-pension-payments/0 -
Option 4) sell the 90K house, buy the £200K house, THEN buy another 90K house to rent. That's the only way to pay the extra stamp duty on the value of the rental house rather than the £200K house. But you incur more agents fees and solicitors fees and end up with a different £90K house that may or may not be as good as the one you have.0
-
You have little equity ! In your home.
You now plan on taking on more debt and becoming a Landlord !
Sell your current home and buy a new place0 -
The extra stamp duty is not for a buy to let property it is for owning more than one house. It equally applies to someone buying a second house as a holiday home which is never let out.0
-
Thanks, looks like there isn't anything that I have missed and I'm stuck with the 3% SD.You have little equity ! In your home.
You now plan on taking on more debt and becoming a Landlord !Option 4) sell the 90K house, buy the £200K house, THEN buy another 90K house to rent. That's the only way to pay the extra stamp duty on the value of the rental house rather than the £200K house. But you incur more agents fees and solicitors fees and end up with a different £90K house that may or may not be as good as the one you have.Time to look into starting a pension.There is no way around it.Do you really want the hassle of being a landlord?You ar buying a 2nd property and becoming a landlord.
Is that not exactly the catagory of person the additional SDLT law was aimed at discouragng, and raising tax revenue from?The way around this is to obtain the passport of a deceased child born some 21+ years ago and buy the 2nd property in that person's name.
Just like any other fraudster.0 -
Buy the new house and pay the extra 3%. That starts the clock on a very generous three years (it's only 18 months in Scotland!) period in which you can do up the now empty first house, sell it and claim back the 3% you paid.
IMHO.0 -
Buy the new house and pay the extra 3%. That starts the clock on a very generous three years (it's only 18 months in Scotland!) period in which you can do up the now empty first house, sell it and claim back the 3% you paid.
I'm thinking this to be honest, as above I'm not looking to become a landlord and I know I'll break even at BEST (probably be slightly out of pocket for the first 1-2 years). I'm fine with paying the mortgage until it sells, it's not a hideous amount to pay for the convenience and houses on my street sell pretty quick.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards