Unknown CCJ with some complexities- please help

[Deleted User]

If they are going to limit you strictly to the defence then they are of course limited to the particulars, they can't have it both ways...

Yes it'll need work to do your statement. Suggest you start using Dropbox to put the claimants docs (redacted) up for comment.

wdm1985

guys- could someone advise- I want to find out who the landowner is for the block of flats.... but when I do landregistry I can only seem to find the way to search specific flats and the landowner is key?
can any one advise?

wdm1985

Hi John- thanks for replying. I ts been a few months. I hope you are well.

Been trawling through their paperwork. Quick question- they have said that they are POFA compliant.. the NTK says that it was for staying longer than the alotted time. I thought that they had to give the time for it to be compliant (It was 8 hrs-but they have just said 'parked for longer than maximum period permitted)

Cheers

ps some good news on the contract front. They have provided 2- one for each management company. No mention of visitor parking in the one covering the time period. The second mentions that visitor parking was previously unlimited- the second only came into effect after the three tickets for the visitors bay.

wdm1985

HI Guys- can anyone further expand on why NTK is not POFA compliant as a rule? drafting my statement all day and need to put this in.
thanks

Coupon-mad

You just compare it to para 8 or 9 of Schedule 4, it's easy to read and you can work out for yourself whether your case relates to para 8, or para 9. Honestly it is that simple to read.

The POFA is linked in the NEWBIES thread (first post, where it says 'if you want to dig deeper').

nosferatu1001

They must comply exactly. No ifs or buts, if itis specified it must be thre. So the PERIOD of parking ie from time a to time b must be there.

If the contract varying teh permitted time canme into force after 3 tickets were issues, and those three ticekts were issued for being there too long, then theyre stuffed. They were not permitted to ticket for those reasons - they had no authority to do so - and in fact have committed a DPA violation by obtaining your details as keeper.

wdm1985

Hey Guys!

Absolutely delighted to say we have taken on UKPC today and won in court. All four tickets dismissed and costs in the case awarded to us. First big step- as you know have the other case hanging over me... but relates to same site.. which I am hoping sets a precedent.
Do I post the review here? would be good to let the prankster know.

thanks everyone for their help. Special mention to coupon and John!

Redx

yes, please post your review here and if you want to tell the prankster email him with a link to this thread and the post number

well done , given that they are currently banned by the DVLA (see pranksters blogs) its great to see even more success against them with their injustices and malpractice and fraudulent activities

Coupon-mad

Do I post the review here?

Yes please, a court report of how it went from the moment you arrived, even outside the court room, conversations with the rep, right through to the hearing and the decision.

Which Judge and court?

WELL DONE!

As Redx said, did you see UKPC are banned by the DVLA at the mo?

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/ukpc-banned-by-dvla.html

wdm1985

I haven't forgotten this yet- just been absolutely swamped.

The judgement in this case is very important for my next case as precedent- can any of you legal beagles advise how I get a typed verdict of the judges closing remarks and judgement. it will wipe out 7 of 8 tickets in my other case.
thanks

WDM