ridiculous valuation of house

glasgowdan

There's a lot of hateful spite on mumsnet too...its almost a game for them, see what their fingers can tap out.

In real life they'll be perfectly smiley and fake rather than showing such "honesty".

Jack_Johnson_the_acorn

nubbins wrote: »

Posts from the Count of Nowhere and Spyguy are especially entertaining, experts in everything from currency to gold to global economy to inflation to politics, unfortunately they got HPI unbelievably wrong

And the spelling of lose and losing.... his grasp of the English language is a little loose.

HPC_Ghuol_Hunter

Jack_Johnson_the_acorn wrote: »

And the spelling of lose and losing.... his grasp of the English language is a little loose.

He also doesn't know how to spell half.

Let's just say that someone who sees value in paying off their landlords mortage instead of their own is not the sharpest tool in the toolbox. Maybe more of a spanner.

Charitable, yes. Intelligent, no.

Mortgagefreeman

Jack_Johnson_the_acorn wrote: »

his grasp of the English language is a little loose.

A bit like his bowels when the Landlord comes round to collect his rent.:rotfl:

snickpan

This was back in January. I appealed, and we got a revised valuation of £491,000, which is just over 10% less than what identical houses were going on the market for

BLOW_FLY

snickpan wrote: »

This was back in January. I appealed, and we got a revised valuation of £491,000, which is just over 10% less than what identical houses were going on the market for

Doesn't matter what they're going on the market for it's the sold prices that count.

BF

snickpan

BLOW_FLY wrote: »

Doesn't matter what they're going on the market for it's the sold prices that count.

BF

yeah, I think that was covered in the OP and a couple of other posts