We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PCM/Gladstones Court Defence - Own Parking Space - Leaseholder

2

Comments

  • mr-robot_2
    mr-robot_2 Posts: 14 Forumite
    @nosferatu1001, should I include the application for for additional costs under CPR27.14(g)(2) in the counterclaim, or is that something that I should do in the witness statement?
  • mr-robot_2
    mr-robot_2 Posts: 14 Forumite
    I just found out that I can email my defense statement, which I would do as a pdf attachment. Would that be advisable? And if so would it be better to send it to their Claim responses & directions contact email address or their County Court Business Centre email address?
  • mr-robot_2
    mr-robot_2 Posts: 14 Forumite
    I have also tweaked 1.8:

    1.8 The only justification that the claimant has provided in response to my denial of debt has been to attempt to misrepresent their legal standing in a threatening manner by:

    a) Quoting Elliot vs Loake [1982] which is irrelevant to this case as I have neither admitted or denied that I was the vehicles driver.
    b) Quoting the Parking Eye vs Bevis [2015] case which is also irrelevant to this case, as this is a residential parking space, that is in a gated underground car park accessible only via a remote that is only issued to residents. The parking is not public, not a commercial venue.
  • nosferatu1001
    nosferatu1001 Posts: 12,961 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    a) is terrible. They quote EvL to claim the Keeper can be presumed to be the driver, however the criminal case turned on irrefutable forensic evidence and the vehicle keepers testimony. Far from creating a presumption, it showed yet again that evidence is required.

    Yes, EMAIL
    HOWEVER you must must must print, SIGN and scan it. Otherwise it wiill not be accepted.

    Additional costs etc is waaaaay later in the process. Skeleton Argument as obviously a Witness Statement is not the place for it - a WS is simply a statement of facts, not argumetn. 27.14... requires some arguing.
  • @nosferatu1001, thanks for the help. Regarding the counter claim, is that good as it stands? Although this is not a case about money, I want to make sure they can't get away with dropping this case, because I want the legal ruling to make sure that these people cannot operate on my property in the future.
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    I admire your tenacity OP as you have told them that your leasehold rights trump their nonsense. Have you considered adding misuse of your data to your counter claim?
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • @The Deep. I am don't think I can. Isn't that only if they acquire my details from the DVLA? I contacted them pretty much immediately because they defaced a vehicle that was parked perfectly legally on on my property. I assumed that they would do the reasonable thing, apologise to me and promise that it would never happen again. Naive maybe, but at the time I assumed that these people would act like professionals.
  • So thanks everyone for all the help! I am going to submit via email tomorrow. Since I need to pay the court fees, should I do that via MCOL, and write in the defense section that it was summit ed via email? Or should I pay the court fees over the phone? Also, I am assuming that the counter claim is okay now with just £150 in damages for trespass, for tortious interference with the quiet enjoyment of my property and £150 in damages for distress and harassment, as a result of the claimants continued persistence in perusing the matter to this stage.
  • I received a copy of Gladstone's Directions Questionnaire, no surprise it has a N180 special direction request, I logged into the MCOL system but there was no dirrection questionaire of my own to complete. Will I be sent the documents by post from the court?
  • Should do. But if not, just download the form online, they're all free. The last date for filing will be the same.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.