IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wrong reg on ukpc ticket

2»

Comments

  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This is the 'large lettering' that helped persuade the Supreme Court judges that the signage was clear, especially the £85 parking charge. Look how large that is!

    Parking%2Bsign_001.jpg
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • waamo
    waamo Posts: 10,298 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    rahulbuyer wrote: »
    Dear Members

    I started looking into the appeal on Newbie post however bit confused regarding the large letter's requirement. How large should the letters be for the large letter requirement?

    To be specific, I'm attaching the sign board at the parking. Does it qualify for large letter

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/150407148@N02/36173221085/in/set-72157686785649685/

    Many thanks


    Ps- The actual pic in the photo evidence is v bad and I cannot read anything on that.

    Why are you trying to do their job for them? It is for the ppc to demonstrate the letters are large enough. If you say they aren't then they have to show they are.
  • rahulbuyer
    rahulbuyer Posts: 23 Forumite
    Coupon-mad wrote: »
    That photo looks more clear than normal UKPC evidence, did you take that?

    Have a look instead at the shaky photos UKPC have on their website by logging in to 'view photos'. Much more useful.


    nononononononononono!!!!!!!! No paying the damn thing, of course you have a case.

    Do as I advised and send the usual appeal online to UKPC at day 26, changing the default to 'registered keeper'.

    Do not wait for the NTK, just crack on and keep the faith about beating this scumbag firm of ex-clampers at POPLA. The whole point is you can't be held liable. You will win by appealing as keeper and the signs won't be likely to come into POPLA's reasoning.

    Yes you are right. The photos on the website are very blurred. I took this one.
  • rahulbuyer
    rahulbuyer Posts: 23 Forumite
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    This is the 'large lettering' that helped persuade the Supreme Court judges that the signage was clear, especially the £85 parking charge. Look how large that is!

    Parking%2Bsign_001.jpg


    Yes this one is definitely large letters:rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.