We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Daylight Driving Lights

1246

Comments

  • pd52
    pd52 Posts: 514 Forumite
    My 2017 Audi A3 has the led drls and rear tail lights on all the time, do does my mums seat ateca
  • Deneb
    Deneb Posts: 421 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    edited 21 July 2017 at 8:04AM
    neilmcl wrote: »
    Not what YOUR manual states.



    You are right. With the light switch in the off position, only DRLs are illuminated with the engine running. I always use the Auto position unless I want to force the use of dipped headlamps, when I switch to the headlamp position. I had filed the use of the Off position in the irrelevant section of my brain, as I see no practical use for it, but you are correct.
  • Mercdriver
    Mercdriver Posts: 3,898 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    pd52 wrote: »
    My 2017 Audi A3 has the led drls and rear tail lights on all the time, do does my mums seat ateca

    I've seen lots of both of these cars. Am yet to see one with rear lights on as DRL.
  • Hedgehog99
    Hedgehog99 Posts: 1,425 Forumite
    I loathe DRLs. They train drivers to look for lights not objects. Another bit of poorly thought-out legislation.

    One of the pleasures of driving in good visibility in daytime used to be not being dazzled by badly-aligned front lights. Now people who don't have DRLs see other cars with lights on and put their side/headlights on too - totally unnecessary.

    Rant over.
  • photome
    photome Posts: 16,742 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Bake Off Boss!
    Mercdriver wrote: »
    I've seen lots of both of these cars. Am yet to see one with rear lights on as DRL.

    Me neither
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    pd52 wrote: »
    My 2017 Audi A3 has the led drls and rear tail lights on all the time, do does my mums seat ateca
    I was on the lookout for cars today driving round with DRLs concentrating mainly for new vehicles and I didn't see one, apart from a Volvo V60 (but that's already been explained) with their rear lights on and that included a 17 plate Audi and VW.
  • facade
    facade Posts: 8,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hedgehog99 wrote: »
    I loathe DRLs. They train drivers to look for lights not objects. Another bit of poorly thought-out legislation.

    Also drivers tend to fixate on bright light sources.

    This is a Bad Thing as in general, you aim the car at what you are fixated on, you need to look at the clear bit of road not the oncoming car (or overly lit up cyclist) if you want to miss them.
    I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....

    (except air quality and Medical Science ;))
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    facade wrote: »
    Also drivers tend to fixate on bright light sources.

    This is a Bad Thing as in general, you aim the car at what you are fixated on, you need to look at the clear bit of road not the oncoming car (or overly lit up cyclist) if you want to miss them.
    You say this but all the evidence suggests that they are safer with than without, hence why they've been legislated for.
  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Daytime not Daylight.

    /pedant ;)
  • facade
    facade Posts: 8,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    neilmcl wrote: »
    You say this but all the evidence suggests that they are safer with than without, hence why they've been legislated for.


    The evidence is no more scientific than my opposite opinion, no testing has ever had solely DRLs as the independent variable, any perceived reduction in accidents/deaths could be correlation rather than causation.
    I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....

    (except air quality and Medical Science ;))
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.