We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Auction item turns out to be fake
Comments
-
The actual full description was:
Gibson Les Paul Custom Guitar (Made in USA, possibly repro)0 -
If the guitar says its a Gibson Les Paul with a made in USA stamp on the back, can the auction house or rather should the auction house be aware that it is not the real deal? Does burden of inspection fall upon the buyer to ascertain the authenticity, particularly as the possibly repro comment was made?Please do not quote spam as this enables it to 'live on' once the spam post is removed.
If you quote me, don't forget the capital 'M'
Declutterers of the world - unite! :rotfl::rotfl:0 -
His legal standpoint would be that the item is claimed to be a protected brand when it turns out that it is not, the selling of something that is counterfeited but copyright branded is illegal in most countries whether new or secondhand, no different than a Rolex or a Guicci handbag.
Def. fake...spelling is often the giveaway!0 -
This is worth a read @OPTHE CAUTIONARY TALE OF THE FAKE ROLEX - BUYER BEWARE!
Buying second hand goods at live local auctions can sometimes be problematic and leave the buyer without a satisfactory legal remedy if the goods do not comply with their descriptions and are later proved to be forgeries or fakes. A recent example involved a second hand watch to be auctioned and described as a Rolex.
Read at:
http://commercial-law-london.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-cautionary-tale-of-fake-rolex-buyer.html====0 -
This is worth a read @OP
Read at:
http://commercial-law-london.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-cautionary-tale-of-fake-rolex-buyer.html
The major difference between that case and the OP's situation is that in the OP's case it appears that the auctioneers suspected that the guitar was counterfeit and because of this, they were committing a criminal offence by selling it.
If they had any doubt to its authenticity then they should have removed it from sale until its providence could be proven.0 -
This sounds like a lot of art sales. There are cases where a piece of art goes up for sale at auction, but if the auction house becomes aware of any question of inaccuracy as to the provenance, they are obliged to cancel the sale. If this is a fake instead of an authorised re-run or reproduction, then I would suggest that the OP look at art fraud cases to see whether the laws applied there are similar enough to apply. Making a really good musical instrument is a skill.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards