50/50 liabilty offer- refuse or accept

Dandytf

lluzers wrote: »

The U K would have to build rooms for a million more prisoners ,if they enforced it.I have seen judges ignore lies in a court and some are too old and deaf and too daft to even notice.

BTW I would rather , he did it all honestly.

I was brought on honesty.

I didnt 'see ' the other car at all until I exited mine' the other car has in effect caught the rear side driverr part and or bumper

thats when 3rd party apolgisedvfor cutting into my lane unintentialy accpeted at fsult and offered to exchange details

I honestly thought my car would have been repaired though from past experience if a car leaves a road insurers will often write the car off

lluzers

Dandytf wrote: »

I was brought on honesty.

I didnt 'see ' the other car at all until I exited mine' the other car has in effect caught the rear side driverr part and or bumper

thats when 3rd party apolgisedvfor cutting into my lane unintentialy accpeted at fsult and offered to exchange details

I honestly thought my car would have been repaired though from past experience if a car leaves a road insurers will often write the car off

How do you know about lane changes ,if he was behind you ?You will be asked many trick questions ,like when did you first hear him or his car .

Presumably you have some photographs of the damage.

It is possible , on impact of the accident , you were forced to flee towards the right?This was possibly a sudden stress reactive response , by your automatic ancestral mind to save you from the attack from the rear.This caused your collision?The stress response is subconscious mind shutting down the command center in the brain , and going into automatic subconscious responses.

Do some research on stress response of fight , flight and flee plus automatic mind .
What you did with your car was a direct result of the attack from behind , the impact trigerred your automatic response.

If you can find the right music for the judge's ears and ask for sympathy from the defendant and the judge , you may win.You have ask "why should you suffer ,because you did nothing wrong" .Now you have stated how it happened , I feel you have a good chance .

Hope this helps.

lluzers

Nice reading here

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-minute-therapist/201606/mind-traps

Geoff1963

no liar has the memory to be a successful liar

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive.

lluzers

Dandytf wrote: »

I honestly thought my car would have been repaired though from past experience if a car leaves a road insurers will often write the car off

Did you have other write offs experiences ?These types of statements give judges thoughts and thoughts become reality , the judges may think of you as a regular wrecker.So best not to say anything like this .

Also you mentioned something about speed

Dandytf wrote: »

Thanks for describing what happened
To add speed wasnt a concern due to major roadworks were ongoing a few years.

Did you speed up ?

Mercdriver

lluzers wrote: »

The U K would have to build rooms for a million more prisoners ,if they enforced it.I have seen judges ignore lies in a court and some are too old and deaf and too daft to even notice.

BTW I would rather , he did it all honestly.

Not a good idea to encourage someone to commit perjury on a public forum. Not for the OP and not for you. It's called soap on a rope and porridge.

Mercdriver

lluzers wrote: »

No !:rotfl:
Committing perjury is not a good idea , because "no liar has the memory to be a successful liar" and not everyone can lie successfully.

Let me refresh your memory (and your quote therefore seems rather apt):

lluzers wrote: »

Get one of your friends to write you a written conditional offer for the car , that you were going to exchange that weekend for £2k+, but the accident happened in the meantime .It might help prevent the third party insurance from screwing you.They might settle.

What you're suggesting is the definition of perjury if repeated in court. If the Op were to make that statement and then retract it in court he would lose all credibility and credibility is VERY important in a civil court, as it's not about reasonable doubt but balance of probabilities. If the OP were inclined to lie about something like this how honest is his statement about how the accident happened?

Mr D.M. look up Perverting the course of justice...

lluzers

Mercdriver wrote: »

Let me refresh your memory (and your quote therefore seems rather apt):



What you're suggesting is the definition of perjury if repeated in court. If the Op were to make that statement and then retract it in court he would lose all credibility and credibility is VERY important in a civil court, as it's not about reasonable doubt but balance of probabilities. If the OP were inclined to lie about something like this how honest is his statement about how the accident happened?

Mr D.M. look up Perverting the course of justice...

The only time I ever won with insurers is by playing dirty with the dirty , that was 30 years ago.
I got hassled when I played fairly about 4 times.

Mercdriver

lluzers wrote: »

The only time I ever won with insurers is by playing dirty with the dirty , that was 30 years ago.
I got hassled when I played fairly about 4 times.

You must be very unlucky to have to make so many claims, let alone to lose each one. Something doesn't add up.

lluzers

Mercdriver wrote: »

You must be very unlucky to have to make so many claims, let alone to lose each one. Something doesn't add up.

I was high millage driver at higher risk of being hit by others , did not lose the 4 claims except they gave me hassle , by delaying 15 months to 2 years for settling .They were throwing silly offers and delaying settlement