📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Stuck between a rock and a hard place...

2

Comments

  • JPears
    JPears Posts: 5,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Didn't we have a ruling or direction somewhere that states the airline is still responsible for informing passenger, even if booked through a third party agent?
    If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide

    The alleged Ringleader.........
  • Tyzap
    Tyzap Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    Yep, see post 2.
    Please read Vaubans superb guide. To find it Google and then download 'vaubans guide'.
  • KevinK
    KevinK Posts: 42 Forumite
    JPears wrote: »
    Didn't we have a ruling or direction somewhere that states the airline is still responsible for informing passenger, even if booked through a third party agent?
    Tyzap wrote: »
    Yep, see post 2.

    Further details on this would be really helpful, ideally something I can quote to the airline. Very close to giving up and going the legal route but this sounds promising.
  • KevinK
    KevinK Posts: 42 Forumite
    Airline got back to me yet again saying to take it up with the third party, so the above would really help.
  • Tyzap
    Tyzap Posts: 2,112 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    KevinK wrote: »
    Further details on this would be really helpful, ideally something I can quote to the airline. Very close to giving up and going the legal route but this sounds promising.

    Hi Kevin,

    Just quote the following from the EC261/2004 regulation. It should be sufficient as they have already admitted that they did not inform you directly.

    3.2.5. Burden of proof in the event of cancellation
    Article 5(4) of the Regulation imposes on air carriers the burden of proof as regards whether and when the passengers have been individually informed about the cancellation of their flight.

    5(4). The burden of proof concerning the questions as to whether and when the passenger has been informed of the cancellation of the flight shall rest with the operating air carrier.

    Good luck.
    Please read Vaubans superb guide. To find it Google and then download 'vaubans guide'.
  • Vauban
    Vauban Posts: 4,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Tyzap wrote: »
    Hi Kevin,

    Just quote the following from the EC261/2004 regulation. It should be sufficient as they have already admitted that they did not inform you directly.

    3.2.5. Burden of proof in the event of cancellation
    Article 5(4) of the Regulation imposes on air carriers the burden of proof as regards whether and when the passengers have been individually informed about the cancellation of their flight.

    5(4). The burden of proof concerning the questions as to whether and when the passenger has been informed of the cancellation of the flight shall rest with the operating air carrier.

    Good luck.

    Also this:

    http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/travel/2017/05/cancelled-flight-airlines-must-now-tell-you-directly
  • jpsartre
    jpsartre Posts: 4,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Since the OP booked from Kiwi.com it's quite possible the contact details on the booking was Kiwi's and not the OP's. You can't demand that the airline notifies the pasenger directly unless the airline actually has the contact details of the passenger!
  • Vauban
    Vauban Posts: 4,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    jpsartre wrote: »
    Since the OP booked from Kiwi.com it's quite possible the contact details on the booking was Kiwi's and not the OP's. You can't demand that the airline notifies the pasenger directly unless the airline actually has the contact details of the passenger!

    The European Court has been very clear on this - it is for the airline, not a third party travel agent, to prove that the passenger has been informed of the cancellation or schedule change. If they can't do this, the passenger is entitled to compensation. So the airlines need to ensure that they have the contact details of the passenger - even when booked by a third party (or have confidence in the performance of the third party, since the airline remains on the hook for the liability).
  • jpsartre
    jpsartre Posts: 4,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My point is, how can Aer Lingus possibly know or ensure that they have the contact details of the passenger if the ticket is booked by a Kiwi employee, using Kiwi email addresses and phone numbers? They can't even know that the ticket is booked by a 3rd party. It's very different from a case where the airline has the contact details of the passenger but chooses to inform only the agent.
  • Vauban
    Vauban Posts: 4,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    And my point is that the airline retains the legal liability, so it would probably be a good idea if it had the systems to collect and store this information. Or it can trust the travel agents to pass on the updates - but in the knowledge that if the travel agents can't prove they've done this, the airline are on the hook for liability. If I were running an airline, I know which I'd do.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.