Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Chatterbox (merged threads)
Comments
-
tahts exact same leter i got0
-
Please note that over the years, we have paid well over £6million in cashbacks. Over many years, chatterbox.com has always acted ethically, morally, legally and has established a strong brand.
That's rubbish. When I was with them 3 years ago, I needed to threaten with legal actions before finally got paid 2 months late.
This model was based on the business assumption that only 40% of all customers would claim their cashback. This model, however, proved to be wrong as the redemption actually was approximately 80%. As a result, the company's financial resources were drained. We believe that the problem which we have faced has been caused by the large corporations which introduced the 40% model.
So they followed this model and failed. Now they are blaming large corporations for making this assumption.
They have put the blame on everyone except themselves for getting into this situation. And now basically telling all customers 'don't sue us or we'll go bust, just sit and wait indefinitely'.0 -
If you sue will you get anything or just be 30+ quid down so looks like waiting will be the best (least bad) option.
Not being paid by an operator would obviously put a dent in cashflow.
Their arguement re redemptions makes no sense - with historic experience of redemptions they must have known that the 40% was unrealistic so why did they sell contracts on this basis, if they were really focussed on their customers surely they should have stopped selling contracts where they knew they would not be able to honour the cashback.I think....0 -
Disagree. I say get in there early and claim because they don't have any valid reason for coming up with the money later. Tou may as well be one of the first to claim and get it rather than wait until they go bust (which, based on their own 40%/80% admission, in my mind they undoubtedly will).The thanks button is here to the right. If you find a post saves you money, gives you useful information, or you agree with it, take a second to thank the poster!

>>>0 -
Sid_Harper wrote: »Tou may as well be one of the first to claim and get it
You can't get blood out of a stone!
They say they have no money now.
So even if you did go to the expense of issuing a claim, (which you would win), you still wouldn't get paid anything.
So making a claim would be just more good money going down the drain.0 -
Yes but I wouldn't necessarily believe all that's in their letter. If they're not insolvent (which I don't think they are yet) then they have to cough up. Of course, they will end up in that state.The thanks button is here to the right. If you find a post saves you money, gives you useful information, or you agree with it, take a second to thank the poster!

>>>0 -
But they don't have to cough up!
You have to make them do so, and a firm in this state has ways and means of avoiding their creditors who may try and enforce any judgements. (Though the Claimant has to pay the costs of enforcement as well as the court costs even though they never get a penny back from the Defendant).
By publishing their letter, they are clearly not too worried about their reputation, or future business - who would now want to do business with them?
So getting CCJs against their name won't worry them either.0 -
If they go into liquidation then I think you become an unsecured creditor and will come bottom of the list after the Banks etc.
Very worrying situation.ummm...0 -
There is an article in today's Mirror about Chatterbox and their problems :-
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/investigates/2007/09/20/phoney-cashback-traps-customers-89520-19817817/What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0 -
I was told a couple of years ago, the same thing by a very Senior employee of that company, about how i should base cashback deals on a 40% redemption. I never heeded these words and chose my own realistic offers.
At the time, they wanted and needed to connect quite a few more subscribers than they had, as they were a new Network, and were offering better rates of commission than anyone else.
This same network, now are making it out to be all down to the dealers, when they were pushing us to offer these cashback deals.
It was a clever move as they had the controlling hand, and once they had achieved what they wanted, they dropped commissions, and started to poach our customers 2 months before we could upgrade them, and threw money at the retention deals, that we could not match.
They also, now have got their own shop base up and running and want to open quite a few more shops of their own, and they have an aim of connecting most customers direct.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
