MSE News: Skipton to launch first cash Lifetime ISA

39 Posts
Skipton Building Society will launch its Lifetime Cash ISA on Thursday paying 0.50% for savers aged 18-39...
Read the full story:
'Skipton to launch first cash Lifetime ISA'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
'Skipton to launch first cash Lifetime ISA'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Has your old furniture become desirable again?
Share your photos in this thread
Join the MSE Forum discussion
Replies
Year target (PVGIS-CMSAF) = 3880kWh - Installer estimate 3452 kWh: Averaging 4300kWh :j
Preferably instead;)
LISA is basically rubbish anyway as the vast majority of PAYE employees get a bigger "bonus" through salary sacrefice. To pay into a cash LISA at an interest rate a quarter of the current inflation rate is sheer madness.
Even if it were true that the "vast" majority of people could get salary sacrifice NI savings, which they can't, a large proportion of employees will already end up making sufficient contributions to workplace pensions offer the course of their life to be on a non-zero marginal tax rate in retirement. As such, incremental workplace pension would be fully taxable at the marginal rate (other than the 25% lump sum tax free). This would convert the basic rate tax relief and NI relief of a sal sac pension to be not a penny better than getting a flat 25% bonus in a Lisa with nil tax to pay on withdrawals.
Also the Lisa does not need planning on timing of withdrawals; whereas taking a big lump from your pension to buy a shiny car or pay off the house needs managing across multiple tax years to avoid going into high rate tax band.
So, I suspect you haven't thought it through.
You are right of course with your second sentence, that a cash account is unsuitable for a 20-30 year retirement vehicle. But that point had already been made by the poster seven hours before you, directly above you in the thread.
...as long as a) you know exactly what level of deposit you are saving towards b) you are aware that you will be running to stand still, i.e. by the time you have saved up your target deposit, houses will be more expensive so you will need to save a bit more again.
I suspect that this applies to fewer people than the conventional wisdom of "if you're saving for less than 5 years you have to use cash" allows for.
And we have already had someone post in the Pensions section of the board asking if this is a good option for their retirement planning. It is a bloody awful option.