We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Forwarding landlord post
Options

bertha337
Posts: 7 Forumite
I signed a lease which included a clause to forward landlord post. I was chased by landlord repeatedly but still didn't forward their post. As a result they had fines for unpaid ground rent and are seeking compensation from me. Is this legally allowed?
P.s I eventually forwarded all post, but several months after it arrived.
P.s I eventually forwarded all post, but several months after it arrived.
0
Comments
-
Why didn''t you forward the post when it arrived?"In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0
-
A more pertinent question is why the landlord didn't arrange for mail forwarding or tell the freeholder that he had moved?"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." -- Red Adair0
-
The OP appears to be asking whether it is legally allowed for the landlord to seek compensation for an alleged non-performance of contract. The first question I'd ask is if you understood this term of the contract, then why didn't you perform as required? (especially having been 'chased' by the LL)
There could be very good reasons - which may turn out to be far more important than whether the LL was morally/legally correct to include such a term in the contract."In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
That landlord may well sue you in small claims court for their loses.
You could argue the landlord should have set up a redirection.
The judge could go either way.Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
If the landlord didn't pay their ground rent, thats entirely their own problem. It is due regardless of whether they received a reminder or not, They agreed contractually to pay it.
I wouldn't be surprised if the landlord's mortgage provider doesn't know they're renting out the property, that's often a reason they continue to get their post sent to a rental property.
I would check your deposit is properly protected too. If they're prepared to break one rule, they're likely to break others.*Assuming you're in England or Wales.0 -
I very much doubt the LL would take this court.
Almost certainly the reason he put this clause in the contract rather than inform the freeholder (and others?) of his address is because he wishes his letting to remain under the official radar.
No consent to let from the freeholder?
No consent to let from the mortgage lender?
No income tax being declared to HMRC?
Court action? Hmmmmmm.....
I'm also pretty doubtful whether that clause could in any case be enforced, or whether the tenant would be legally liable for the LL's costs.0 -
Indeed: £5 says landlord is on the fiddle.
Unless the forwarding clause had a time limit (e.g. "must be forwarded within 5 days..."..) then as long as you forwarded it at some point you've complied with it. (or Royal mail lost it of course... oh yes, forwarded it ages ago dinnan I ...... hmmmnnn...)
What EXACTLY does it state, please?0 -
The clause must also be fair, so for example you shouldn't be expected to pay for the post - did he supply envelopes, stamps etc.?0
-
This is a clause that is not intrinsically unfair and you knowingly breached it so I would say that you are liable for any loss that the landlord could not avoid.
Whether the tenant has to pay for stamps does not in itself make the clause unfair.
As for "time limits", I think it has to be implied in any such clause that the tenant must forward mail within a reasonable time. I would think within a week unless there is a good reason not to.0 -
Miss_Samantha wrote: »This is a clause that is not intrinsically unfair and you knowingly breached it so I would say that you are liable for any loss that the landlord could not avoid.
And I'm not sure how the landlord would prove whether and when their tenant received any mail.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards