PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deposit protection/return?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    G_M wrote: »
    Had a quick look and can't acually see where I wrote that. However, if I did, then it's my poor wording.

    Answer is - no, it also applies to companies and any institution letting out property on an Assured Tenancy.

    If you let me know here I wrote that, I'll amend.



    It's in the quote you supplied, s.213 of the act. (edited as I missed it when I checked)
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 30 May 2017 at 1:10PM
    Guest101 wrote: »
    It's in the quote you supplied, s.213 of the act. (edited as I missed it when I checked)
    :rotfl:

    and there was me ploughing through
    * Deposits: payment, protection and return
    looking for it!

    It's in the Act. Non mea culpa.

    Strangely the 1st 2 clauses of the Act refer to 'a person', and then all subsequent clauses refer to 'a landlord'. Since it places the obligations on 'the landlord', ThePants' concern is unfounded. But I don't understand why the act uses 'the person' in those clauses.
  • benjus
    benjus Posts: 5,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    The word "person" in legal contexts isn't the same as in general usage.
    “Person” includes a body of persons corporate or unincorporate. [1889]

    ( http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30 )
    Let's settle this like gentlemen: armed with heavy sticks
    On a rotating plate, with spikes like Flash Gordon
    And you're Peter Duncan; I gave you fair warning
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.