NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.

Passengers less likely to be able to claim for bird strike flight delays

Passengers may not be able to claim compensation for a flight delay caused by a plane hitting a bird, after a European court ruled in favour of the airlines.:
'Passengers less likely to be able to claim for bird strike flight delays after EU ruling'
OfficialStamp.gif
Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
Read the latest MSE News
Flag up a news story: [email protected]
Get the Free Martin's Money Tips E-mail

Replies

  • richardwrichardw Forumite
    19.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Forumite
    But aren't bird strikes "inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier"?
    Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.
  • TyzapTyzap Forumite
    2.1K Posts
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    richardw wrote: »
    But aren't bird strikes "inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier"?

    They may well be but this is what European Court said....(my bold)

    In the present case, a collision between an aircraft and a bird, as well as any damage caused by that collision, since they are not intrinsically linked to the operating system of the aircraft, are not by their nature or origin inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier concerned and are outside its actual control. Accordingly, that collision must be classified as ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004.
    Please read Vaubans superb guide. To find it Google and then download 'vaubans guide'.
  • VaubanVauban Forumite
    4.7K Posts
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    richardw wrote: »
    But aren't bird strikes "inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier"?

    I've often thought the prospect of challenging weather was inherent in the operation of an airline, so never understood why weather was exempted - except it would have been manifestly unfair to do so. There is a bit of a flaw in the Wallentin test, to be honest, even if my sympathy for the airlines is limited.
  • edited 18 May 2017 at 6:22AM
    boatmanboatman Forumite
    4.7K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 18 May 2017 at 6:22AM
    With regard to weather, if all the planes are 1 hour late and your flight is 4 hours late, is it still just 'weather'?
  • hanbhanb Forumite
    464 Posts
    I've just had an email saying that my claim can no longer be pursued after this ruling :( It had been on hold for ages. Shame, the £600 would have been lovely but there we go.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum